code review 8799047: time: improve the explanation of the working of Format ...

time: improve the explanation of the working of Format and Parse
Change the term 'standard time', which already means something,
to 'reference time', and add a couple of sentences and clarifications.

[r, 2013-04-22 17:29:39]

Hello golang-dev@googlegroups.com,

I'd like you to review this change to
https://code.google.com/p/go

[bradfitz, 2013-04-22 17:37:08]

https://codereview.appspot.com/8799047/diff/1/src/pkg/time/example_test.go
File src/pkg/time/example_test.go (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/8799047/diff/1/src/pkg/time/example_test.go#ne...
src/pkg/time/example_test.go:62: const format = "Jan 2, 2006 at 3:04pm (MST)"
s/format/layout/ to be consistent with the terms used elsewhere?

[r, 2013-04-22 17:56:44]

https://codereview.appspot.com/8799047/diff/1/src/pkg/time/example_test.go
File src/pkg/time/example_test.go (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/8799047/diff/1/src/pkg/time/example_test.go#ne...
src/pkg/time/example_test.go:62: const format = "Jan 2, 2006 at 3:04pm (MST)"
On 2013/04/22 17:37:08, bradfitz wrote:
> s/format/layout/ to be consistent with the terms used elsewhere?

Done.

[r, 2013-04-22 17:58:11]

Hello golang-dev@googlegroups.com, bradfitz@golang.org (cc:
golang-dev@googlegroups.com),

Please take another look.

[bradfitz, 2013-04-22 18:27:33]

LGTM

[r, 2013-04-22 18:36:24]

*** Submitted as https://code.google.com/p/go/source/detail?r=60242cfc12c3 ***

time: improve the explanation of the working of Format and Parse
Change the term 'standard time', which already means something,
to 'reference time', and add a couple of sentences and clarifications.

R=golang-dev, bradfitz
CC=golang-dev
https://codereview.appspot.com/8799047

[knieriem, 2013-04-22 19:11:59]

https://codereview.appspot.com/8799047/diff/10001/src/pkg/time/format.go
File src/pkg/time/format.go (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/8799047/diff/10001/src/pkg/time/format.go#newc...
src/pkg/time/format.go:637: // would be interepreted if it were the value; it
serves as an example of
One letter 'e' too many?