Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(2189)

Issue 8266047: Restore dots that overflow chords; issue 3179

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
11 years ago by Keith
Modified:
10 years, 6 months ago
CC:
lilypond-devel_gnu.org
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Remove dots that overflow chords, working individually on each voice; issue 3179

Patch Set 1 : For now, just revert the old patch #

Patch Set 2 : Remove dots per-chord #

Total comments: 2

Patch Set 3 : rebased, regression test #

Total comments: 1

Patch Set 4 : re-rebase #

Patch Set 5 : re-interpret Gould #

Patch Set 6 : Gould aint the boss of me #

Patch Set 7 : less clever #

Total comments: 1
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+56 lines, -4 lines) Patch
A input/regression/chord-dots.ly View 1 2 3 4 5 1 chunk +17 lines, -0 lines 1 comment Download
M lily/dot-column.cc View 1 2 3 4 5 6 5 chunks +35 lines, -4 lines 0 comments Download
M scm/define-grob-properties.scm View 1 2 3 4 5 1 chunk +3 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M scm/define-grobs.scm View 1 2 3 4 5 1 chunk +1 line, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 6
Trevor Daniels
Patch set 2 looks promising, but in view of the imminence of next stable and ...
11 years ago (2013-04-07 07:51:08 UTC) #1
lemzwerg
LGTM, with minor nits. Thanks for the patch! https://codereview.appspot.com/8266047/diff/15001/input/regression/chord-dots.ly File input/regression/chord-dots.ly (left): https://codereview.appspot.com/8266047/diff/15001/input/regression/chord-dots.ly#oldcode21 input/regression/chord-dots.ly:21: } ...
11 years ago (2013-04-08 06:42:45 UTC) #2
lemzwerg
LGTM, but one patch too much :-) https://codereview.appspot.com/8266047/diff/19001/ly/titling-init.ly File ly/titling-init.ly (left): https://codereview.appspot.com/8266047/diff/19001/ly/titling-init.ly#oldcode144 ly/titling-init.ly:144: Oops! Changes ...
11 years ago (2013-04-09 06:30:51 UTC) #3
lemzwerg
LGTM, thanks. https://codereview.appspot.com/8266047/diff/60001/input/regression/chord-dots.ly File input/regression/chord-dots.ly (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/8266047/diff/60001/input/regression/chord-dots.ly#newcode12 input/regression/chord-dots.ly:12: \override Staff.DotColumn.chord-dots-limit = #1 What about adding ...
10 years, 6 months ago (2013-11-02 06:40:52 UTC) #4
Trevor Daniels
LGTM Trevor
10 years, 6 months ago (2013-11-02 11:11:39 UTC) #5
Keith
10 years, 6 months ago (2013-11-02 21:43:00 UTC) #6
On 2013/11/02 06:40:52, lemzwerg wrote:

>
https://codereview.appspot.com/8266047/diff/60001/input/regression/chord-dots...
> input/regression/chord-dots.ly:12: \override Staff.DotColumn.chord-dots-limit
=
> #1
> What about adding the default case (chord-dots-limit = #3) for comparison?

I did include comparisons for the earlier patch review, but for the pushed
regression test I want short output that looks good when the code works, and
looks odd if it ever fails.
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b