code review 70720043: syscall: update NetBSD/ARM port to EABI.

syscall: update NetBSD/ARM port to EABI.

[minux1, 2014-03-03 08:10:36]

Hello golang-codereviews@googlegroups.com,

I'd like you to review this change to
https://code.google.com/p/go

[jsing, 2014-03-03 11:35:48]

LGTM

https://codereview.appspot.com/70720043/diff/40001/src/pkg/syscall/zsyscall_n...
File src/pkg/syscall/zsyscall_netbsd_arm.go (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/70720043/diff/40001/src/pkg/syscall/zsyscall_n...
src/pkg/syscall/zsyscall_netbsd_arm.go:1: // mksyscall.pl -l32 -arm
syscall_bsd.go syscall_netbsd.go syscall_netbsd_arm.go
Should this also be added to mkall.sh?

[minux1, 2014-03-06 05:56:04]

*** Submitted as https://code.google.com/p/go/source/detail?r=4e58a371558f ***

syscall: update NetBSD/ARM port to EABI.

LGTM=jsing
R=golang-codereviews, jsing
CC=golang-codereviews
https://codereview.appspot.com/70720043

[minux1, 2014-03-06 05:58:35]

On 2014/03/03 11:35:48, jsing wrote:
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/70720043/diff/40001/src/pkg/syscall/zsyscall_n...
> src/pkg/syscall/zsyscall_netbsd_arm.go:1: // mksyscall.pl -l32 -arm
> syscall_bsd.go syscall_netbsd.go syscall_netbsd_arm.go
> Should this also be added to mkall.sh?
Yes. Sorry I forget to address this before submission.

Will address it in a future netbsd/arm change

[minux1, 2014-03-06 06:00:33]

On 2014/03/06 05:58:35, minux wrote:
> On 2014/03/03 11:35:48, jsing wrote:
> >
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/70720043/diff/40001/src/pkg/syscall/zsyscall_n...
> > src/pkg/syscall/zsyscall_netbsd_arm.go:1: // mksyscall.pl -l32 -arm
> > syscall_bsd.go syscall_netbsd.go syscall_netbsd_arm.go
> > Should this also be added to mkall.sh?
> Yes. Sorry I forget to address this before submission.
> 
> Will address it in a future netbsd/arm change
Actually we don't have any netbsd-arm related stuff in mkall.sh, so it worth
a new CL.

[gobot, 2014-03-06 06:03:39]

This CL appears to have broken the darwin-amd64 builder.

[minux1, 2014-03-06 06:05:55]

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:03 AM, <gobot@golang.org> wrote:

> This CL appears to have broken the darwin-amd64 builder
>
this is real. I need to do something in api/except.txt.