code review 6929058: doc/gopher: add high-resolution pencil sketches

doc/gopher: add high-resolution pencil sketches
These are higher-resolution scans of the little
drawings used as clip art on golang.org

[r, 2012-12-12 18:30:55]

Hello golang-dev@googlegroups.com,

I'd like you to review this change to
https://go.googlecode.com/hg/

[bradfitz, 2012-12-12 18:32:53]

Time for a go.art subrepo?

Does the golang.org website depend on these?

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:30 AM, <r@golang.org> wrote:

> Reviewers: golang-dev_googlegroups.com,
>
> Message:
> Hello golang-dev@googlegroups.com,
>
> I'd like you to review this change to
> https://go.googlecode.com/hg/
>
>
> Description:
> doc/gopher: add high-resolution pencil sketches
> These are higher-resolution scans of the little
> drawings used as clip art on golang.org
>
> Please review this at
https://codereview.appspot.**com/6929058/<https://codereview.appspot.com/6929...
>
> Affected files:
>   A doc/gopher/pencil/gopherhat.**jpg
>   A doc/gopher/pencil/**gopherhelmet.jpg
>   A doc/gopher/pencil/gophermega.**jpg
>   A doc/gopher/pencil/**gopherrunning.jpg
>   A doc/gopher/pencil/gopherswim.**jpg
>   A doc/gopher/pencil/**gopherswrench.jpg
>
>
>

[r, 2012-12-12 18:34:41]

We could move the gophers out if that's what's desired. People often
ask for the art. It's moronic that the best way to publish art is as
an open-source repo, but the modern world is indeed badly broken.

Golang.org does not depend on the high-res files, but it does depend
on a lot of images, some of which are already in the repo and should
stay there.

-rob

[rsc, 2012-12-12 18:39:45]

LGTM

It seems fine to me. We're not generating art at a particularly high rate.

[r, 2012-12-12 18:51:49]

*** Submitted as https://code.google.com/p/go/source/detail?r=f319ec79d278 ***

doc/gopher: add high-resolution pencil sketches
These are higher-resolution scans of the little
drawings used as clip art on golang.org

R=bradfitz, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://codereview.appspot.com/6929058