Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(5579)

Issue 6615071: worker/provisioner: initial password for machine

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
11 years, 6 months ago by rog
Modified:
11 years, 6 months ago
Reviewers:
mp+128961
Visibility:
Public.

Description

worker/provisioner: initial password for machine https://code.launchpad.net/~rogpeppe/juju-core/115-set-entity-passwords/+merge/128961 (do not edit description out of merge proposal)

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : worker/provisioner: initial password for machine #

Patch Set 3 : worker/provisioner: initial password for machine #

Total comments: 2

Patch Set 4 : worker/provisioner: initial password for machine #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+46 lines, -6 lines) Patch
A [revision details] View 1 1 chunk +2 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M trivial/password.go View 1 chunk +9 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M trivial/password_test.go View 2 chunks +12 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M worker/provisioner/provisioner.go View 5 chunks +14 lines, -6 lines 0 comments Download
M worker/provisioner/provisioner_test.go View 1 chunk +9 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 3
rog
Please take a look.
11 years, 6 months ago (2012-10-10 15:15:21 UTC) #1
niemeyer
LGTM https://codereview.appspot.com/6615071/diff/4001/worker/provisioner/provisioner.go File worker/provisioner/provisioner.go (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/6615071/diff/4001/worker/provisioner/provisioner.go#newcode209 worker/provisioner/provisioner.go:209: log.Printf("provisioner: machine %v already started as instance %q", ...
11 years, 6 months ago (2012-10-10 15:20:58 UTC) #2
rog
11 years, 6 months ago (2012-10-10 15:56:27 UTC) #3
*** Submitted:

worker/provisioner: initial password for machine

R=niemeyer
CC=
https://codereview.appspot.com/6615071

https://codereview.appspot.com/6615071/diff/4001/worker/provisioner/provision...
File worker/provisioner/provisioner.go (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/6615071/diff/4001/worker/provisioner/provision...
worker/provisioner/provisioner.go:209: log.Printf("provisioner: machine %v
already started as instance %q", m, instId)
On 2012/10/10 15:20:58, niemeyer wrote:
> We've been going in the opposite direction and dropping these prefixes
> everywhere. We have to make up our minds and talk about it rather than
> implicitly put things on and off.

ok. i'll leave them in for the time being (there are lots of places that still
have them) and we'll decide on some policy.
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b