Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(3846)

Issue 6300060: state: store units inside their respective services

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
11 years, 10 months ago by rog
Modified:
11 years, 10 months ago
Reviewers:
mp+109120
Visibility:
Public.

Description

state: store units inside their respective services Making this change simplifies a lot of code - no need to keep a separate sequence numbering system for units, for example. (original proposal at https://codereview.appspot.com/6247066/) https://code.launchpad.net/~rogpeppe/juju-core/go-state-units-under-service/+merge/109120 (do not edit description out of merge proposal)

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : state: store units inside their respective services #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+518 lines, -619 lines) Patch
A [revision details] View 1 1 chunk +2 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M state/internal_test.go View 8 chunks +322 lines, -386 lines 0 comments Download
M state/machine.go View 3 chunks +10 lines, -14 lines 0 comments Download
M state/service.go View 10 chunks +27 lines, -56 lines 0 comments Download
M state/state.go View 1 chunk +5 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M state/state_test.go View 2 chunks +4 lines, -7 lines 0 comments Download
M state/topology.go View 13 chunks +100 lines, -126 lines 0 comments Download
M state/unit.go View 1 8 chunks +48 lines, -30 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 1
rog
11 years, 10 months ago (2012-06-07 12:08:12 UTC) #1
*** Submitted:

state: store units inside their respective services

Making this change simplifies a lot of code - no need
to keep a separate sequence numbering system for units,
for example.

(original proposal at https://codereview.appspot.com/6247066/)

R=
CC=
https://codereview.appspot.com/6300060
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b