Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(28)

Issue 5691043: Reenables cajaVM.log in playground. (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
14 years, 4 months ago by metaweta
Modified:
14 years, 4 months ago
Reviewers:
Jasvir, ihab.awad
CC:
google-caja-discuss_googlegroups.com
Base URL:
http://google-caja.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Reenables cajaVM.log in the playground.

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 2

Patch Set 2 : Reenables cajaVM.log in playground. #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+19 lines, -7 lines) Patch
M src/com/google/caja/demos/playground/client/ui/PlaygroundView.java View 1 4 chunks +19 lines, -7 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 3
metaweta
14 years, 4 months ago (2012-02-23 00:19:35 UTC) #1
ihab.awad
lgtm++ http://codereview.appspot.com/5691043/diff/1/src/com/google/caja/demos/playground/client/ui/PlaygroundView.java File src/com/google/caja/demos/playground/client/ui/PlaygroundView.java (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5691043/diff/1/src/com/google/caja/demos/playground/client/ui/PlaygroundView.java#newcode499 src/com/google/caja/demos/playground/client/ui/PlaygroundView.java:499: that.@com.google.caja.demos.playground.client.ui.PlaygroundView::addRuntimeMessage(Ljava/lang/String;) We should think of what the risk ...
14 years, 4 months ago (2012-02-23 00:31:52 UTC) #2
metaweta
14 years, 4 months ago (2012-02-23 00:33:59 UTC) #3
http://codereview.appspot.com/5691043/diff/1/src/com/google/caja/demos/playgr...
File src/com/google/caja/demos/playground/client/ui/PlaygroundView.java (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/5691043/diff/1/src/com/google/caja/demos/playgr...
src/com/google/caja/demos/playground/client/ui/PlaygroundView.java:499:
that.@com.google.caja.demos.playground.client.ui.PlaygroundView::addRuntimeMessage(Ljava/lang/String;)
On 2012/02/23 00:31:53, ihab.awad wrote:
> We should think of what the risk is, if any, if the error contains HTML,
> including <script>s. Either way, I think this needs a comment explaining the
> reasoning.

Done.
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b