On 2020/02/29 22:37:03, hanwenn wrote: > tested by running 'make dist' Maybe move the removal ...
5 years, 2 months ago
(2020-02-29 23:57:03 UTC)
#2
On 2020/02/29 22:37:03, hanwenn wrote:
> tested by running 'make dist'
Maybe move the removal of the GROFF test/flag here? If there should be some
unexpected breakage at some point of time, that makes it more likely that it can
be handled with a single revert.
On 2020/02/29 23:57:03, dak wrote: > On 2020/02/29 22:37:03, hanwenn wrote: > > tested by ...
5 years, 2 months ago
(2020-02-29 23:58:40 UTC)
#3
On 2020/02/29 23:57:03, dak wrote:
> On 2020/02/29 22:37:03, hanwenn wrote:
> > tested by running 'make dist'
>
> Maybe move the removal of the GROFF test/flag here? If there should be some
> unexpected breakage at some point of time, that makes it more likely that it
can
> be handled with a single revert.
Even though the relation at the current point of time is not really
programmatically enforced. It's just about putting related removals into the
same place.
Issue 557560044: Remove unused .1 => .txt rule
(Closed)
Created 5 years, 2 months ago by hanwenn
Modified 5 years, 1 month ago
Reviewers: dak
Base URL:
Comments: 0