Sorry about taking so long to review. -joe http://codereview.appspot.com/4439066/diff/1/tests/gdata_tests/spreadsheets/live_client_test.py File tests/gdata_tests/spreadsheets/live_client_test.py (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/4439066/diff/1/tests/gdata_tests/spreadsheets/live_client_test.py#newcode160 tests/gdata_tests/spreadsheets/live_client_test.py:160: test_worksheet ...
12 years, 11 months ago
(2011-05-22 05:05:05 UTC)
#2
12 years, 10 months ago
(2011-06-10 01:04:17 UTC)
#3
http://codereview.appspot.com/4439066/diff/1/tests/gdata_tests/spreadsheets/l...
File tests/gdata_tests/spreadsheets/live_client_test.py (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4439066/diff/1/tests/gdata_tests/spreadsheets/l...
tests/gdata_tests/spreadsheets/live_client_test.py:160: test_worksheet =
self.client.add_worksheet(
On 2011/05/22 05:05:05, jcgregorio_google wrote:
> Will this fail if the worksheet already exists? If so then accommodate that
> condition and continue with the test.
No failure, it is possible to have worksheets with the same name. It won't cause
a problem since we operate on worksheet ID.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4439066/diff/1/tests/gdata_tests/spreadsheets/l...
tests/gdata_tests/spreadsheets/live_client_test.py:194: test_worksheet =
self.client.add_worksheet(
On 2011/05/22 05:05:05, jcgregorio_google wrote:
> Same as above comment if the sheet already exists.
Same as above, no issue.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4439066/diff/1/tests/gdata_tests/spreadsheets/l...
tests/gdata_tests/spreadsheets/live_client_test.py:210: # Update the row.
On 2011/05/22 05:05:05, jcgregorio_google wrote:
> maybe just remember the # of rows and that they decrease, instead of
explicitly
> checking for 1 and 0.
Since we create a new worksheet, I think checking for 0 and 1 would be more
accurate.
Issue 4439066: gdata-py Adding Spreadsheets cells and list feeds to v2 client.
Created 13 years ago by j.s
Modified 12 years, 10 months ago
Reviewers: jcgregorio, jcgregorio_google
Base URL:
Comments: 6