OK. Though it's sort of undocumented that you can *write* this property at all (if ...
13 years, 3 months ago
(2011-01-19 20:07:01 UTC)
#3
OK. Though it's sort of undocumented that you can *write* this
property at all (if you write a new ACL with a withKey it'll ignore
the key value you give and generate a new one, which gets read back);
is it OK to make the tests depend on this
semi-undocumented-but-highly-useful property?
--
glasser@davidglasser.net | langtonlabs.org | flickr.com/photos/glasser/
If it's that useful then it will get used, so having tests would be good. ...
13 years, 3 months ago
(2011-01-19 20:09:26 UTC)
#4
If it's that useful then it will get used, so having tests would be
good.
-joe
On 2011/01/19 20:07:01, glasser_davidglasser.net wrote:
> OK. Though it's sort of undocumented that you can *write* this
> property at all (if you write a new ACL with a withKey it'll ignore
> the key value you give and generate a new one, which gets read back);
> is it OK to make the tests depend on this
> semi-undocumented-but-highly-useful property?
>
>
> --
> mailto:glasser@davidglasser.net | http://langtonlabs.org |
flickr.com/photos/glasser/
Issue 4023042: Support withKey element in Docs ACL feed.
Created 13 years, 3 months ago by dglasser
Modified 13 years, 3 months ago
Reviewers: jcgregorio, glasser_davidglasser.net
Base URL:
Comments: 0