Issue 339860043: RBF kernel

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
m :	publish + mail comments
M :	edit review message
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line
<Enter> :	respond to / edit current comment
d :	mark current comment as done

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
m :	publish + mail comments
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue
# :	close issue

	Comment/message editing
<Ctrl> + s or <Ctrl> + Enter :	save comment
<Esc> :	cancel edit

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review

Created:
6 years, 5 months ago by wissemchouk

Modified:
6 years, 5 months ago

Reviewers:
liulee.chn, tsumak.dmitri, cuteliaoliao, Jiangfeng, mumuzuge

CC:
dkostic, w.fakher.reda

Visibility:
Public.

modified data to suit RBF; RBF function with a 67% accuracy BUG=

Created: 6 years, 5 months ago

Download [raw] [tar.bz2]

	Unified diffs	Side-by-side diffs	Stats (+159 lines, -0 lines)			Patch
A	MLtool/data/sort_rank.csv	View	1 chunk	+72 lines, -0 lines	0 comments	Download
A	MLtool/scripts/RBF.py	View	1 chunk	+46 lines, -0 lines	0 comments	Download
A	MLtool/scripts/knn.py	View	1 chunk	+21 lines, -0 lines	0 comments	Download
A	MLtool/scripts/svm.py	View	1 chunk	+20 lines, -0 lines	0 comments	Download

Total messages: 2

cuteliaoliao

Seems RBF performs better. How can we further improve the accuracy?

6 years, 5 months ago (2017-11-23 13:29:56 UTC) #1

mumuzuge

6 years, 5 months ago (2017-11-23 13:31:34 UTC) #2

By using the RBF kernel on data, the accuracy is improved.