https://codereview.appspot.com/269310044/diff/20001/lib/softoken/pkcs11.c File lib/softoken/pkcs11.c (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/269310044/diff/20001/lib/softoken/pkcs11.c#new... lib/softoken/pkcs11.c:2764: rvstr = NULL; This shouldn't be necessary, since rvstr has to be NULL to get pass the check on line 2746.
On 2015/10/16 03:14:04, mt wrote: > https://codereview.appspot.com/269310044/diff/20001/lib/softoken/pkcs11.c > File lib/softoken/pkcs11.c (right): > > https://codereview.appspot.com/269310044/diff/20001/lib/softoken/pkcs11.c#new... > lib/softoken/pkcs11.c:2764: rvstr = NULL; > This shouldn't be necessary, since rvstr has to be NULL to get pass the check on > line 2746. rvstr is actually always NULL when we jump to loser (that switch statement is unreadable with those indentations... we need clang-format fast)