Rewrite chrome_test_utils

Rewrite chrome_test_utils.

audits.addInputEvent() creates modern-style InputLatency events, so RAILIRFinder
must be updated to use typeName even though it's about to be rewritten by
https://codereview.appspot.com/248740043/

R=dsinclair@chromium.org, nduca@google.com

Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/trace-viewer/+/d174f17ed8c80cd89c1c2eec3a1c0a4c9bad3283

[benjhayden, 2015-07-08 17:42:17]

PTAL

[dsinclair, 2015-07-08 19:33:45]

https://codereview.appspot.com/255850043/diff/40001/tracing/tracing/model/asy...
File tracing/tracing/model/async_slice.html (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/255850043/diff/40001/tracing/tracing/model/asy...
tracing/tracing/model/async_slice.html:32: this.cat = this.category;  //
TODO(benjhayden): Deprecate?
This seems like a separate change, can you please pull it out to it's own CL?
Where are we using .cat and not .category or visa-versa. Which do we use in
other places?

[benjhayden, 2015-07-08 20:25:30]

https://codereview.appspot.com/255850043/diff/40001/tracing/tracing/model/asy...
File tracing/tracing/model/async_slice.html (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/255850043/diff/40001/tracing/tracing/model/asy...
tracing/tracing/model/async_slice.html:32: this.cat = this.category;  //
TODO(benjhayden): Deprecate?
On 2015/07/08 19:33:44, dsinclair wrote:
> This seems like a separate change, can you please pull it out to it's own CL?
> Where are we using .cat and not .category or visa-versa. Which do we use in
> other places?

Done.

[benjhayden, 2015-07-20 23:26:51]

PTAL

[nduca(google), 2015-07-20 23:31:39]

seems fine lgtm was dan okay with the patch?

https://codereview.appspot.com/255850043/diff/100001/tracing/tracing/extras/c...
File tracing/tracing/extras/chrome/chrome_test_utils.html (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/255850043/diff/100001/tracing/tracing/extras/c...
tracing/tracing/extras/chrome/chrome_test_utils.html:39: function
addEvent(thread, dict) {
createAndAddAsyncSliceEventToThread(). But at that point.... maybe worth just
making the call directly?

[benjhayden, 2015-07-20 23:42:02]

I'll wait for Dan. Thanks!

https://codereview.appspot.com/255850043/diff/100001/tracing/tracing/extras/c...
File tracing/tracing/extras/chrome/chrome_test_utils.html (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/255850043/diff/100001/tracing/tracing/extras/c...
tracing/tracing/extras/chrome/chrome_test_utils.html:39: function
addEvent(thread, dict) {
On 2015/07/20 23:31:39, nduca(google) wrote:
> createAndAddAsyncSliceEventToThread(). But at that point.... maybe worth just
> making the call directly?

Done.
Yeah, I went back and forth on addEvent.

[dsinclair, 2015-07-21 14:31:26]

lgtm. Please set or remove the BUG= line before committing.

[benjhayden, 2015-07-21 18:37:06]

Committed patchset #5 (id:140001) manually as
d174f17ed8c80cd89c1c2eec3a1c0a4c9bad3283 (presubmit successful).