Issue 254860043: Issue 4472: Let \mark and Mark_engraver act consistently

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
m :	publish + mail comments
M :	edit review message
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line
<Enter> :	respond to / edit current comment
d :	mark current comment as done

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
m :	publish + mail comments
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue
# :	close issue

	Comment/message editing
<Ctrl> + s or <Ctrl> + Enter :	save comment
<Esc> :	cancel edit

Issue 254860043: Issue 4472: Let \mark and Mark_engraver act consistently (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review

Created:
8 years, 10 months ago by dak

Modified:
8 years, 9 months ago

Reviewers:

CC:
lilypond-devel_gnu.org

Visibility:
Public.

More Reviews

Description

Issue 4472: Let \mark and Mark_engraver act consistently Both will now accept a label meeting the number-or-markup? predicate. Previously, \mark accepted any expression and Mark_engraver dealt only partly with them.

Patch Set 1 #

Created: 8 years, 10 months ago

Download [raw] [tar.bz2]

		Unified diffs	Side-by-side diffs	Delta from patch set	Stats (+5 lines, -11 lines)			Patch
	M	lily/mark-engraver.cc	View		1 chunk	+3 lines, -9 lines	0 comments	Download
	M	ly/music-functions-init.ly	View		2 chunks	+2 lines, -2 lines	0 comments	Download