[dev.garbage] code review 188730043: runtime: raise StackGuard limit for Windows (again)

runtime: raise StackGuard limit for Windows (again)

640 bytes ought to be enough for anybody.

We'll bring this back down before Go 1.5. That's issue 9214.

[rsc, 2014-12-06 00:50:08]

Hello rlh (cc: golang-codereviews@googlegroups.com),

I'd like you to review this change to the dev.garbage branch of
https://code.google.com/p/go/

[rsc, 2014-12-06 00:50:14]

*** Submitted as https://code.google.com/p/go/source/detail?r=d1238958d4ae ***

[dev.garbage] runtime: raise StackGuard limit for Windows (again)

640 bytes ought to be enough for anybody.

We'll bring this back down before Go 1.5. That's issue 9214.

TBR=rlh
CC=golang-codereviews
https://codereview.appspot.com/188730043

[Mike.Rosset, 2014-12-06 02:06:29]

On 2014/12/06 00:50:14, rsc wrote:
> *** Submitted as https://code.google.com/p/go/source/detail?r=d1238958d4ae ***
> 
> [dev.garbage] runtime: raise StackGuard limit for Windows (again)
> 
> 640 bytes ought to be enough for anybody.
> 
> We'll bring this back down before Go 1.5. That's issue 9214.
> 
> TBR=rlh
> CC=golang-codereviews
> https://codereview.appspot.com/188730043

oh the irony!

[rlh, 2014-12-06 16:56:02]

On 2014/12/06 02:06:29, Mike.Rosset wrote:
> On 2014/12/06 00:50:14, rsc wrote:
> > *** Submitted as https://code.google.com/p/go/source/detail?r=d1238958d4ae
***
> > 
> > [dev.garbage] runtime: raise StackGuard limit for Windows (again)
> > 
> > 640 bytes ought to be enough for anybody.
> > 
> > We'll bring this back down before Go 1.5. That's issue 9214.
> > 
> > TBR=rlh
> > CC=golang-codereviews
> > https://codereview.appspot.com/188730043
> 
> oh the irony!

LGTM
Not sure what the GC did to cause this but more memory is an indulgence that can
hide many sins.