Eval,unresolved variables, and other minor changes in chapter 12 tests.

Many of the Test from Chapter 12 of the specification are not runnable in ECMAScript 5. 

1) I eliminate the unresolved variables
2) In S12.2_A11 add dot notation to the test
3) In S12.5_A5 add information about the Exception that has been launch.

[christian.plesner.hansen, 2010-08-08 02:52:42]

> 12.2_Variable_Statement/S12.2_A11.js

Consider adding a CHECK #5 at the end that tests that __another_var also has the
correct value after the variable declaration has been executed.

> 12.5_The_if_Statement/S12.5_A5.js
> $ERROR('#3.1: "__func = __funct " ...

That should be __func = __func right, without the 't'?

> S12.6.1_A2.js
> do var __in__do = "reached"; while (abbracadabra);

This changes what is being tested right?  It would have to be

var __in__do;
do __in__do ...

to continue to test exactly the same thing.

[Jasvir, 2010-08-19 22:07:02]

LGTM

Codereview broken for this change.

Misspelt "balloon" in A2 and "expression" in A5.

[pedro.delgallego, 2010-08-20 00:12:08]

On 2010/08/19 22:07:02, jasvir wrote:
> LGTM
> 
> Codereview broken for this change.
> 
> Misspelt "balloon" in A2 and "expression" in A5.

I fixed the codereview.

[christian.plesner.hansen, 2010-08-25 04:27:32]

Can you upload a new patch set containing the fixes?

On 2010/08/20 00:12:08, pedro.delgallego wrote:
> On 2010/08/19 22:07:02, jasvir wrote:
> > LGTM
> > 
> > Codereview broken for this change.
> > 
> > Misspelt "balloon" in A2 and "expression" in A5.
> 
> I fixed the codereview.

[christian.plesner.hansen, 2010-08-25 04:29:36]

I see that has already been submitted.  Nevermind then.

On 2010/08/25 04:27:32, christian.plesner.hansen wrote:
> Can you upload a new patch set containing the fixes?
> 
> On 2010/08/20 00:12:08, pedro.delgallego wrote:
> > On 2010/08/19 22:07:02, jasvir wrote:
> > > LGTM
> > > 
> > > Codereview broken for this change.
> > > 
> > > Misspelt "balloon" in A2 and "expression" in A5.
> > 
> > I fixed the codereview.

[pedro.delgallego, 2010-08-30 10:19:47]

On 2010/08/25 04:29:36, christian.plesner.hansen wrote:
> I see that has already been submitted.  Nevermind then.

I fixed the tests (S12.2_A11, S12.5_A5, S12.6.1_A2) as you suggested. 

I also mark test S12.2_A2.js as strict_mode_negative.

You can check the change in the new patch set.