code review 162060043: unsafe: document that unsafe programs are not protected

unsafe: document that unsafe programs are not protected
The compatibility guideline needs to be clear about this even
though it means adding a clause that was not there from the
beginning. It has always been understood, so this isn't really
a change in policy, just in its expression.

[r, 2014-10-23 15:59:36]

Hello golang-codereviews@googlegroups.com,

I'd like you to review this change to
https://code.google.com/p/go

[bradfitz, 2014-10-23 16:06:30]

LGTM

[gri, 2014-10-23 16:42:35]

LGTM

https://codereview.appspot.com/162060043/diff/1/doc/go1compat.html
File doc/go1compat.html (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/162060043/diff/1/doc/go1compat.html#newcode108
doc/go1compat.html:108: Use of <code>unsafe</code>. Packages that import the
s/of /of package / ?

And then just:

Packages that import unsafe may depend ...

[r, 2014-10-23 16:43:40]

Hello golang-codereviews@googlegroups.com, bradfitz@golang.org, gri@golang.org
(cc: golang-codereviews@googlegroups.com),

Please take another look.

[gri, 2014-10-23 16:44:36]

LGTM

[rsc, 2014-10-24 00:15:50]

LGTM

[r, 2014-10-24 16:37:30]

*** Submitted as https://code.google.com/p/go/source/detail?r=20e544e3b39e ***

unsafe: document that unsafe programs are not protected
The compatibility guideline needs to be clear about this even
though it means adding a clause that was not there from the
beginning. It has always been understood, so this isn't really
a change in policy, just in its expression.

LGTM=bradfitz, gri, rsc
R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz, gri, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://codereview.appspot.com/162060043

[gobot, 2014-10-26 23:24:20]

This CL appears to have broken the linux-amd64-nocgo builder.
See http://build.golang.org/log/d7a5849378eb38de7f045b3cc18db127fb813774