Use dependencies.tsv when building the tarball.

Use dependencies.tsv when building the tarball.

build-release-tarball.bash hard-codes the deps. The script must be hacked
to make a release. This branch updated the script to use the deps for
the version that is being released.

Note that ere is a hack in the rules to accommodate an error in
lp:gnuflag. Reoger and I were not able to solve the GhostRevisionsHaveNoRevno,
so I use an alterate branch with the same revisions. I hope to resolve
the hack in a few days.

https://code.launchpad.net/~sinzui/juju-core/build-release-tarball-from-deps/+merge/189164

(do not edit description out of merge proposal)

[curtis, 2013-10-03 19:32:33]

Please take a look.

[axw1, 2013-10-04 01:31:55]

On 2013/10/03 19:32:33, curtis wrote:
> Please take a look.

LGTM, this is great.
It would be good if godeps would do the initial checkout (go get -d), though
then you'd have to give up the lightweight checkout.

[curtis, 2013-10-08 20:41:41]

Please take a look.

[curtis, 2013-10-08 20:49:47]

Per the request to use godeps, I had to do some major restructuring to support
godeps, ultimately replacing the bash manual construction of the tree with "go
get" and godeps. "go get" fails when the tree is partially built by a script;
doing less allows the developer way of building work. The two tricky changes to
the script are:
   * The revert of juju-core to the version we are releasing between "go get"
and godeps
   * Postponing the naming of the tree (GOPATH or WORK) until after we are
certain juju-core
     is the correct version and builds.

[axw, 2013-10-09 01:29:40]

Thanks, LGTM (just one comment typo). Much more maintainable, I think.

https://codereview.appspot.com/14354043/diff/5001/scripts/build-release-tarba...
File scripts/build-release-tarball/build-release-tarball.bash (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/14354043/diff/5001/scripts/build-release-tarba...
scripts/build-release-tarball/build-release-tarball.bash:27: echo "Updadting
juju-core dependencies to the required versions."
Typo

[curtis, 2013-10-09 18:35:15]

Please take a look.

[axw, 2013-10-09 23:54:40]

On 2013/10/09 18:35:15, curtis wrote:
> Please take a look.

Thanks. BTW, if someone says "LGTM with these minor things...", then you can go
ahead and land.