Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(5610)

Issue 133390043: Remove documentation for \instrumentSwitch (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
9 years, 8 months ago by Keith
Modified:
9 years, 3 months ago
Reviewers:
davide.liessi, dak, Trevor Daniels, t.daniels
CC:
lilypond-devel_gnu.org
Visibility:
Public.

Description

in favor of \set to set properties, and Textscripts for markup

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 5

Patch Set 2 : fix errors found by Trevor #

Patch Set 3 : rebase on the issue4078 patch #

Total comments: 2

Patch Set 4 : typo corrections #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+40 lines, -75 lines) Patch
M Documentation/notation/staff.itely View 7 chunks +37 lines, -60 lines 0 comments Download
M Documentation/notation/vocal.itely View 4 chunks +3 lines, -15 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 5
Trevor Daniels
A few minor comments below, but I don't see how we can just remove the ...
9 years, 8 months ago (2014-08-31 08:06:46 UTC) #1
Keith
On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 01:06:46 -0700, <tdanielsmusic@googlemail.com> wrote: > A few minor comments below, ...
9 years, 8 months ago (2014-08-31 18:37:19 UTC) #2
t.daniels_treda.co.uk
Keith, you wrote Sunday, August 31, 2014 7:36 PM > > On Sun, 31 Aug ...
9 years, 8 months ago (2014-08-31 21:49:03 UTC) #3
davide.liessi
https://codereview.appspot.com/133390043/diff/60001/Documentation/notation/staff.itely File Documentation/notation/staff.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/133390043/diff/60001/Documentation/notation/staff.itely#newcode967 Documentation/notation/staff.itely:967: along with other settings as neded for the new ...
9 years, 8 months ago (2014-08-31 22:55:11 UTC) #4
dak
9 years, 8 months ago (2014-09-01 03:04:14 UTC) #5
On 2014/08/31 22:55:11, davide.liessi wrote:
>
https://codereview.appspot.com/133390043/diff/60001/Documentation/notation/st...
> File Documentation/notation/staff.itely (right):

>
https://codereview.appspot.com/133390043/diff/60001/Documentation/notation/st...
> Documentation/notation/staff.itely:972: prepPiccolo =
> <>^\markup\italic\line{"muta in Piccolo"}
> Is '\line' needed here? I think that it can be omitted.

<>^\markup \italic "muta in Piccolo"

would be fine and sufficient.  Omitting the spaces in that construct seems
cramped style, however.

> The same for 'prepFlute' at line 982.
> 
> Also, for coding style uniformity with the other '\markup...' commands in this
> patch set, maybe this should be written '\markup { \italic "muta in Piccolo"
}',
> and similarly for lines 978, 982 and 988.

I prefer not throwing redundant markup lists around.  \markup { ... } only works
because at top level markup, a markup list like { ... } is wrapped in an
additional \line layer.
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b