Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(1676)

Issue 123170043: [dev.power64] code review 123170043: cmd/9g: first check point (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
10 years, 7 months ago by minux
Modified:
10 years, 7 months ago
Reviewers:
gobot, rsc
CC:
rsc, iant, golang-codereviews
Visibility:
Public.

Description

cmd/9g: first check point

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : diff -r 1129a4022aa64fa2fd3975bf67740eafb80ce526 https://code.google.com/p/go #

Patch Set 3 : diff -r 1129a4022aa64fa2fd3975bf67740eafb80ce526 https://code.google.com/p/go #

Patch Set 4 : diff -r 1129a4022aa64fa2fd3975bf67740eafb80ce526 https://code.google.com/p/go #

Total comments: 59

Patch Set 5 : diff -r 1129a4022aa64fa2fd3975bf67740eafb80ce526 https://code.google.com/p/go #

Patch Set 6 : diff -r 1129a4022aa64fa2fd3975bf67740eafb80ce526 https://code.google.com/p/go #

Patch Set 7 : diff -r 1129a4022aa64fa2fd3975bf67740eafb80ce526 https://code.google.com/p/go #

Patch Set 8 : diff -r 1129a4022aa64fa2fd3975bf67740eafb80ce526 https://code.google.com/p/go #

Patch Set 9 : diff -r 1129a4022aa64fa2fd3975bf67740eafb80ce526 https://code.google.com/p/go #

Patch Set 10 : diff -r 1129a4022aa64fa2fd3975bf67740eafb80ce526 https://code.google.com/p/go #

Patch Set 11 : diff -r 1129a4022aa64fa2fd3975bf67740eafb80ce526 https://code.google.com/p/go #

Patch Set 12 : diff -r fd607ecfa65865f880ef47c522a4c77b91f299bf https://code.google.com/p/go #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+1680 lines, -1870 lines) Patch
M src/cmd/9g/cgen.c View 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 27 chunks +306 lines, -302 lines 0 comments Download
M src/cmd/9g/galign.c View 1 2 3 4 2 chunks +13 lines, -25 lines 0 comments Download
M src/cmd/9g/gg.h View 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 chunks +7 lines, -12 lines 0 comments Download
M src/cmd/9g/ggen.c View 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 28 chunks +275 lines, -466 lines 0 comments Download
M src/cmd/9g/gobj.c View 1 2 3 4 9 chunks +36 lines, -31 lines 0 comments Download
M src/cmd/9g/gsubr.c View 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 40 chunks +431 lines, -1034 lines 0 comments Download
A src/cmd/9g/opt.h View 1 2 3 4 1 chunk +219 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
A src/cmd/9g/peep.c View 1 2 3 4 1 chunk +94 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
A src/cmd/9g/prog.c View 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 chunk +138 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
A src/cmd/9g/reg.c View 1 2 3 4 1 chunk +161 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 10
minux
Hello rsc@golang.org, iant@golang.org (cc: golang-codereviews@googlegroups.com), I'd like you to review this change to the dev.power64 ...
10 years, 7 months ago (2014-08-11 07:33:58 UTC) #1
rsc
These are copied from 6g, right? Can you do an hg cp -A so that ...
10 years, 7 months ago (2014-08-11 17:55:39 UTC) #2
minux
On 2014/08/11 17:55:39, rsc wrote: > These are copied from 6g, right? Can you do ...
10 years, 7 months ago (2014-08-11 18:10:48 UTC) #3
rsc
https://codereview.appspot.com/123170043/diff/60001/src/cmd/9g/cgen.c File src/cmd/9g/cgen.c (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/123170043/diff/60001/src/cmd/9g/cgen.c#newcode160 src/cmd/9g/cgen.c:160: if(n->addable && res->addable) { res->addable should be true. there ...
10 years, 7 months ago (2014-08-11 19:00:38 UTC) #4
minux
Hello rsc@golang.org, iant@golang.org (cc: golang-codereviews@googlegroups.com), Please take another look.
10 years, 7 months ago (2014-08-12 03:10:58 UTC) #5
minux
https://codereview.appspot.com/123170043/diff/60001/src/cmd/9g/cgen.c File src/cmd/9g/cgen.c (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/123170043/diff/60001/src/cmd/9g/cgen.c#newcode204 src/cmd/9g/cgen.c:204: // TODO(minux): we shouldn't re-order FP comparisons, but then ...
10 years, 7 months ago (2014-08-12 03:11:18 UTC) #6
rsc
LGTM
10 years, 7 months ago (2014-08-12 03:16:04 UTC) #7
minux
*** Submitted as https://code.google.com/p/go/source/detail?r=374c2eb01bdb *** [dev.power64] cmd/9g: first check point LGTM=rsc R=rsc, iant CC=golang-codereviews https://codereview.appspot.com/123170043
10 years, 7 months ago (2014-08-12 03:45:01 UTC) #8
gobot
This CL appears to have broken the netbsd-amd64-bsiegert builder. See http://build.golang.org/log/9bdac8dc1119e72f6e62e5c080ed1b89630adf28
10 years, 7 months ago (2014-08-12 05:29:20 UTC) #9
minux
10 years, 7 months ago (2014-08-12 06:42:33 UTC) #10
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:29 AM, <gobot@golang.org> wrote:

> This CL appears to have broken the netbsd-amd64-bsiegert builder.
> See http://build.golang.org/log/9bdac8dc1119e72f6e62e5c080ed1b89630adf28

Nope.

# GOMAXPROCS=2 runtime -cpu=1,2,4
--- FAIL: TestFinalizerType-4 (4.62s)
mfinal_test.go:61: finalizer for type func(*int) didn't run
FAIL
FAIL runtime 221.289s
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b