Added a very basic test to create ticket

Added a very basic test to create ticket

[Thomas.J.Waldmann, 2014-08-06 12:49:39]

https://codereview.appspot.com/122940043/diff/20001/MoinMoin/items/_tests/tes...
File MoinMoin/items/_tests/test_Ticket.py (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/122940043/diff/20001/MoinMoin/items/_tests/tes...
MoinMoin/items/_tests/test_Ticket.py:1: # License: GNU GPL v2 (or any later
version), see LICENSE.txt for details.
usually module names are lowercase and test module names are
test_<modulnamethatistested>.

so it would be test_ticket.py here.

https://codereview.appspot.com/122940043/diff/20001/MoinMoin/items/_tests/tes...
MoinMoin/items/_tests/test_Ticket.py:12: class TestTicket():
this is an old-style class.

do our other tests also use old-style classes?

https://codereview.appspot.com/122940043/diff/20001/MoinMoin/items/_tests/tes...
MoinMoin/items/_tests/test_Ticket.py:39: assert item.meta[CONTENTTYPE] ==
self.contenttype
it's a beginning, but not testing that much more than we likely already test at
another place.

[sksaurabhkathpalia, 2014-08-06 13:04:54]

https://codereview.appspot.com/122940043/diff/20001/MoinMoin/items/_tests/tes...
File MoinMoin/items/_tests/test_Ticket.py (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/122940043/diff/20001/MoinMoin/items/_tests/tes...
MoinMoin/items/_tests/test_Ticket.py:12: class TestTicket():
On 2014/08/06 12:49:38, Thomas.J.Waldmann wrote:
> this is an old-style class.
> 
> do our other tests also use old-style classes?

Yeah test_Blog.py also uses this type of class. I took reference from that only

[Thomas.J.Waldmann, 2014-08-09 17:22:58]

> > do our other tests also use old-style classes?
> 
> Yeah test_Blog.py also uses this type of class. I took reference from that
only

NO. It does not.

[Thomas.J.Waldmann, 2014-08-17 14:52:25]

> NO. It does not.

No reply?

When you say that test_Blog.py uses old-style classes and I tell you that this
is obviously not the case (see line 24 there), why is there no reaction from
you?

[sksaurabhkathpalia, 2014-08-17 15:56:51]

On 2014/08/17 14:52:25, Thomas.J.Waldmann wrote:
> > NO. It does not.
> 
> No reply?
> 
> When you say that test_Blog.py uses old-style classes and I tell you that this
> is obviously not the case (see line 24 there), why is there no reaction from
> you?

sorry Thomas, Actually I was busy with some other stuff for the project so I
didn't get a time to think on it. I will try to come to it after solving issues
mentioned in the feedback.
sorry for the inconvenience.