On 2013/07/28 05:51:49, DMorsing wrote: > LGTM. I'd like the opnion of someone else for ...
11 years, 10 months ago
(2013-08-03 09:13:12 UTC)
#3
On 2013/07/28 05:51:49, DMorsing wrote:
> LGTM.
I'd like the opnion of someone else for this change.
Note that it doesn't handle the problem of embeedded builtins, which I think is
larger and separate.
On 2013/08/03 09:13:12, remyoudompheng wrote: > On 2013/07/28 05:51:49, DMorsing wrote: > > LGTM. > ...
11 years, 10 months ago
(2013-08-03 10:23:04 UTC)
#4
On 2013/08/03 09:13:12, remyoudompheng wrote:
> On 2013/07/28 05:51:49, DMorsing wrote:
> > LGTM.
>
> I'd like the opnion of someone else for this change.
> Note that it doesn't handle the problem of embeedded builtins, which I think
is
> larger and separate.
Fine by me.
Talking about issue 5974, right? I haven't worked on that since I identified the
symbol table weirdness.
On 2013/08/03 10:23:04, DMorsing wrote: > On 2013/08/03 09:13:12, remyoudompheng wrote: > > On 2013/07/28 ...
11 years, 9 months ago
(2013-08-05 19:56:32 UTC)
#5
On 2013/08/03 10:23:04, DMorsing wrote:
> On 2013/08/03 09:13:12, remyoudompheng wrote:
> > On 2013/07/28 05:51:49, DMorsing wrote:
> > > LGTM.
> >
> > I'd like the opnion of someone else for this change.
> > Note that it doesn't handle the problem of embeedded builtins, which I think
> is
> > larger and separate.
>
> Fine by me.
>
> Talking about issue 5974, right? I haven't worked on that since I identified
the
> symbol table weirdness.
Submitting this in 10 minutes.
Issue 11373044: code review 11373044: cmd/gc: fix inlining of unnamed structs with embedded f...
(Closed)
Created 11 years, 10 months ago by remyoudompheng
Modified 11 years, 9 months ago
Reviewers: dave_cheney.net
Base URL:
Comments: 0