Add homebrew release instructions.

Add homebrew release instructions.

Also fixed bad coding in HACKING.rst.  Used the 'restview'
package from PyPI to verify it.  Replaced long embedded
URLs with references.  Looks very nice if rendered but
not as good if read as plaintext.

https://code.launchpad.net/~bac/juju-quickstart/hacking-brew/+merge/223601

(do not edit description out of merge proposal)

[bac, 2014-06-18 16:04:17]

Please take a look.

[frankban, 2014-06-18 16:17:25]

LGTM with minor changes. Thank you!

https://codereview.appspot.com/106120043/diff/1/HACKING.rst
File HACKING.rst (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/106120043/diff/1/HACKING.rst#newcode215
HACKING.rst:215: #. Compute the SHA1 checksum for the tgz and insert it as the
JujuQuickstart
Juju Quickstart?

https://codereview.appspot.com/106120043/diff/1/HACKING.rst#newcode221
HACKING.rst:221: download failures are acceptable.)::
are acceptable)

https://codereview.appspot.com/106120043/diff/1/HACKING.rst#newcode252
HACKING.rst:252: rebase the branch and squash commits before pushing.
Could you give a hint about how much time passes between Jenkins tests pass and
the updated formula is merged? Is it merged right after the tests run?

[bac, 2014-06-18 17:50:49]

*** Submitted:

Add homebrew release instructions.

Also fixed bad coding in HACKING.rst.  Used the 'restview'
package from PyPI to verify it.  Replaced long embedded
URLs with references.  Looks very nice if rendered but
not as good if read as plaintext.

R=frankban
CC=
https://codereview.appspot.com/106120043

https://codereview.appspot.com/106120043/diff/1/HACKING.rst
File HACKING.rst (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/106120043/diff/1/HACKING.rst#newcode215
HACKING.rst:215: #. Compute the SHA1 checksum for the tgz and insert it as the
JujuQuickstart
On 2014/06/18 16:17:24, frankban wrote:
> Juju Quickstart?

Actually brew constructs a Ruby class based on the package name, so in the file
it really is JujuQuickstart.

https://codereview.appspot.com/106120043/diff/1/HACKING.rst#newcode221
HACKING.rst:221: download failures are acceptable.)::
On 2014/06/18 16:17:25, frankban wrote:
> are acceptable)

Done.

https://codereview.appspot.com/106120043/diff/1/HACKING.rst#newcode221
HACKING.rst:221: download failures are acceptable.)::
On 2014/06/18 16:17:25, frankban wrote:
> are acceptable)

Done.

https://codereview.appspot.com/106120043/diff/1/HACKING.rst#newcode252
HACKING.rst:252: rebase the branch and squash commits before pushing.
I will.  This update was flawless and when Jenkins passed the bot merged it in. 
Total time was about two hours.