code review 962043: go_faq: typo fix

go_faq: typo fix

[adg, 2010-04-22 23:18:20]

Hello rsc (cc: golang-dev@googlegroups.com),

I'd like you to review this change.

[rsc, 2010-04-22 23:18:59]

LGTM

[r2, 2010-04-22 23:19:23]

LGTM

On Apr 22, 2010, at 4:18 PM, adg@golang.org wrote:

> Reviewers: rsc,
>
> Message:
> Hello rsc (cc: golang-dev@googlegroups.com),
>
> I'd like you to review this change.
>
>
> Description:
> go_faq: typo fix
>
> Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/962043/show
>
> Affected files:
>  M doc/go_faq.html
>
>
> Index: doc/go_faq.html
> ===================================================================
> --- a/doc/go_faq.html
> +++ b/doc/go_faq.html
> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@
>
> <p>
> Still, there is room for improvement. The compilers are good but  
> could be
> -better, many librarise need major performance work, and the garbage  
> collector
> +better, many libraries need major performance work, and the garbage  
> collector
> isn't fast enough yet (even if it were, taking care not to generate  
> unnecessary
> garbage can have a huge effect).
> </p>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Subscription settings:
http://groups.google.com/group/golang-dev/subscribe?hl=en

[gri1, 2010-04-22 23:19:52]

LGTM

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:18 PM, <adg@golang.org> wrote:

> Reviewers: rsc,
>
> Message:
> Hello rsc (cc: golang-dev@googlegroups.com),
>
> I'd like you to review this change.
>
>
> Description:
> go_faq: typo fix
>
> Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/962043/show
>
> Affected files:
>  M doc/go_faq.html
>
>
> Index: doc/go_faq.html
> ===================================================================
> --- a/doc/go_faq.html
> +++ b/doc/go_faq.html
> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@
>
>  <p>
>  Still, there is room for improvement. The compilers are good but could be
> -better, many librarise need major performance work, and the garbage
> collector
> +better, many libraries need major performance work, and the garbage
> collector
>  isn't fast enough yet (even if it were, taking care not to generate
> unnecessary
>  garbage can have a huge effect).
>  </p>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Subscription settings:
> http://groups.google.com/group/golang-dev/subscribe?hl=en
>

[adg, 2010-04-23 00:01:16]

Well, I'm glad I was able to get consensus for this controversial change.

On 23 April 2010 09:19, Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com> wrote:
> LGTM
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:18 PM, <adg@golang.org> wrote:
>>
>> Reviewers: rsc,
>>
>> Message:
>> Hello rsc (cc: golang-dev@googlegroups.com),
>>
>> I'd like you to review this change.
>>
>>
>> Description:
>> go_faq: typo fix
>>
>> Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/962043/show
>>
>> Affected files:
>>  M doc/go_faq.html
>>
>>
>> Index: doc/go_faq.html
>> ===================================================================
>> --- a/doc/go_faq.html
>> +++ b/doc/go_faq.html
>> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@
>>
>>  <p>
>>  Still, there is room for improvement. The compilers are good but could be
>> -better, many librarise need major performance work, and the garbage
>> collector
>> +better, many libraries need major performance work, and the garbage
>> collector
>>  isn't fast enough yet (even if it were, taking care not to generate
>> unnecessary
>>  garbage can have a huge effect).
>>  </p>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Subscription settings:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/golang-dev/subscribe?hl=en
>
>

[adg, 2010-04-23 00:02:14]

*** Submitted as http://code.google.com/p/go/source/detail?r=463340d2391e ***

go_faq: typo fix

R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
http://codereview.appspot.com/962043