Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(9641)

Issue 6979043: Make gm's json results include checksums even if run without --readPath (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
11 years, 11 months ago by epoger
Modified:
11 years, 11 months ago
Reviewers:
EricB, rmistry
CC:
skia-review_googlegroups.com
Base URL:
http://skia.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Make gm's json results include checksums even if run without --readPath Committed: https://code.google.com/p/skia/source/detail?r=6917

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 4

Patch Set 2 : add_no-comparison_status #

Total comments: 3

Patch Set 3 : synced_to_head #

Messages

Total messages: 5
epoger
https://codereview.appspot.com/6979043/diff/1/gm/tests/outputs/no-readpath/output-expected/json-summary.txt File gm/tests/outputs/no-readpath/output-expected/json-summary.txt (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/6979043/diff/1/gm/tests/outputs/no-readpath/output-expected/json-summary.txt#newcode11 gm/tests/outputs/no-readpath/output-expected/json-summary.txt:11: "expected-results" : null Similar to https://code.google.com/p/skia/source/browse/trunk/gm/tests/outputs/compared-against-empty-dir/output-expected/json-summary.txt , but expected-results ...
11 years, 11 months ago (2012-12-19 19:48:31 UTC) #1
rmistry
LGTM https://codereview.appspot.com/6979043/diff/1/gm/gmmain.cpp File gm/gmmain.cpp (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/6979043/diff/1/gm/gmmain.cpp#newcode662 gm/gmmain.cpp:662: } else { make this an 'else if' ...
11 years, 11 months ago (2012-12-19 20:01:00 UTC) #2
epoger
Per discussion with Eric yesterday, I added a new "no-comparison" status. Details below... I'd like ...
11 years, 11 months ago (2012-12-20 17:28:01 UTC) #3
EricB
LGTM. If the rebaselining script gets much bigger, I'd suggest moving to python with a ...
11 years, 11 months ago (2012-12-20 17:56:40 UTC) #4
epoger
11 years, 11 months ago (2012-12-20 18:33:34 UTC) #5
On 2012/12/20 17:56:40, EricB wrote:
> LGTM.  If the rebaselining script gets much bigger, I'd suggest moving to
python
> with a thin wrapper.

Agreed, thanks.
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b