Dual license the files under mf/ using OFL.

Dual license the files under mf/ using OFL.

[Graham Percival, 2012-12-21 06:57:53]

I suspect that the GNUMakefile.in will need .OFL to be added to the EXTRA_DIST.

[hanwenn, 2012-12-21 12:59:35]

Huh? Isn't dist generated by asking Git nowadays?


On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:57 AM,  <graham@percival-music.ca> wrote:
> I suspect that the GNUMakefile.in will need .OFL to be added to the
> EXTRA_DIST.
>
> https://codereview.appspot.com/6970046/



-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwen@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen

[Graham Percival, 2012-12-22 00:43:52]

Oops, I'd forgotten about that.  Yes, it looks like it's done by
git.

On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 01:59:34PM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Huh? Isn't dist generated by asking Git nowadays?
> 
> 
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:57 AM,  <graham@percival-music.ca> wrote:
> > I suspect that the GNUMakefile.in will need .OFL to be added to the
> > EXTRA_DIST.
> >
> > https://codereview.appspot.com/6970046/
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwen@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen

[pkx166h, 2012-12-26 23:56:05]

Hanwen - this has now 'push' status - in case you are not following the tracker

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3044

[lemzwerg, 2012-12-27 21:47:45]

Sorry for being late.

LGTM, with a (not so) minor nit.

https://codereview.appspot.com/6970046/diff/1/LICENSE.OFL
File LICENSE.OFL (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/6970046/diff/1/LICENSE.OFL#newcode2
LICENSE.OFL:2: Copyright (c) 1996, 1997, ..., 2012, The LilyPond authors
(lilypond.org)
I strongly suggest to use

  Copyright (c) 1996-2012 The LilyPond authors (lilypond.org)

which is the canonical form w.r.t. a range of copyrighted years.

[hanwenn, 2013-01-05 15:02:33]

nitpicks

[hanwenn, 2013-01-05 15:03:06]

nitpicks

[lemzwerg, 2013-01-05 18:33:55]

LGTM