Add alias in Spanish for espanol note names language

Add alias in Spanish for espanol note names language

[janek, 2012-11-02 08:34:02]

Ah, so \language "español" will do the same as \language "espanol"?  That's
nice.

[pacovila, 2012-11-02 08:39:11]

Yes, it adds a copy without deactivating the original.
El 02/11/2012 09:34, <janek.lilypond@gmail.com> escribió:

> Ah, so \language "español" will do the same as \language "espanol"?
> That's nice.
>
>
>
http://codereview.appspot.com/**6811060/<http://codereview.appspot.com/6811060/>
>

[pacovila, 2012-11-06 18:18:52]

http://codereview.appspot.com/6811060/diff/4001/scm/define-note-names.scm
File scm/define-note-names.scm (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/6811060/diff/4001/scm/define-note-names.scm#new...
scm/define-note-names.scm:961: ;; add two native utf-8 alisases. Pairs obey
cp-like order: '(old new)
It should be 'aliases', of course.

[pacovila, 2012-11-07 15:57:58]

https://codereview.appspot.com/6811060/diff/4001/scm/define-note-names.scm
File scm/define-note-names.scm (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/6811060/diff/4001/scm/define-note-names.scm#ne...
scm/define-note-names.scm:964: (append language-pitch-names
I will use two-spaces indenting here. Emacs indent-region inserted the tabs.

[pacovila, 2012-11-12 08:40:28]

Hello. Am I countdowned or rather needsworked? Thanks.

[janek, 2012-11-12 18:54:11]

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:40 AM,  <paconet.org@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello. Am I countdowned or rather needsworked? Thanks.

It seems that you're countdowned.  I don't know why there are two
tracker issues for this (2941 and 2940), but 2940 has status "push".

Janek

[pacovila, 2012-11-12 19:07:35]

2012/11/12 Janek Warchoł <janek.lilypond@gmail.com>:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:40 AM,  <paconet.org@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello. Am I countdowned or rather needsworked? Thanks.
>
> It seems that you're countdowned.  I don't know why there are two
> tracker issues for this (2941 and 2940), but 2940 has status "push".

I only created one. Did not receive the push notice as usual. Thanks
for the looksgoodtomeing.
-- 
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com

[janek, 2012-11-12 19:14:34]

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Francisco Vila <paconet.org@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2012/11/12 Janek Warchoł <janek.lilypond@gmail.com>:
>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:40 AM,  <paconet.org@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hello. Am I countdowned or rather needsworked? Thanks.
>>
>> It seems that you're countdowned.  I don't know why there are two
>> tracker issues for this (2941 and 2940), but 2940 has status "push".
>
> I only created one. Did not receive the push notice as usual. Thanks
> for the looksgoodtomeing.

Well, both of them say "Reported by project member paconet.org".
I think git-cl tricked you.  Probably the second issue was created
when you uploaded second patch set; i suppose you didn't specify the
tracker issue number and a new one was created instead of updating
existing one.

cheers,
Janek

[pacovila, 2012-11-12 19:29:49]

2012/11/12 Janek Warchoł <janek.lilypond@gmail.com>:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Francisco Vila <paconet.org@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> 2012/11/12 Janek Warchoł <janek.lilypond@gmail.com>:
>>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:40 AM,  <paconet.org@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hello. Am I countdowned or rather needsworked? Thanks.
>>>
>>> It seems that you're countdowned.  I don't know why there are two
>>> tracker issues for this (2941 and 2940), but 2940 has status "push".
>>
>> I only created one. Did not receive the push notice as usual. Thanks
>> for the looksgoodtomeing.
>
> Well, both of them say "Reported by project member paconet.org".
> I think git-cl tricked you.  Probably the second issue was created
> when you uploaded second patch set; i suppose you didn't specify the
> tracker issue number and a new one was created instead of updating
> existing one.

I remember git-cl created the rietveld code-reviewing issue and I
created the googlecode tracking issue by hand. Is the google code
tracking issue created automatically as well?

-- 
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com

[janek, 2012-11-12 19:32:06]

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Francisco Vila <paconet.org@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2012/11/12 Janek Warchoł <janek.lilypond@gmail.com>:
>> Well, both of them say "Reported by project member paconet.org".
>> I think git-cl tricked you.  Probably the second issue was created
>> when you uploaded second patch set; i suppose you didn't specify the
>> tracker issue number and a new one was created instead of updating
>> existing one.
>
> I remember git-cl created the rietveld code-reviewing issue and I
> created the googlecode tracking issue by hand. Is the google code
> tracking issue created automatically as well?

yes, unless you're using a very outdated git-cl.

jaenk