Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(5324)

Issue 6260055: test-only: add test coverage of skdiff over input with identical bits or pixels (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
12 years, 6 months ago by epoger
Modified:
12 years, 6 months ago
CC:
skia-review_googlegroups.com
Base URL:
http://skia.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/
Visibility:
Public.

Description

test-only: add test coverage of skdiff over input with identical bits or pixels Committed: https://code.google.com/p/skia/source/detail?r=4084

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : #

Total comments: 1
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+28 lines, -0 lines) Patch
M tools/tests/run.sh View 1 1 chunk +16 lines, -0 lines 1 comment Download
A tools/tests/skdiff/identical-bits-or-pixels/output-expected/command_line View 1 chunk +1 line, -0 lines 0 comments Download
A tools/tests/skdiff/identical-bits-or-pixels/output-expected/return_value View 1 chunk +1 line, -0 lines 0 comments Download
A tools/tests/skdiff/identical-bits-or-pixels/output-expected/stdout View 1 chunk +4 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
A tools/tests/skdiff/identical-bits/output-expected/command_line View 1 chunk +1 line, -0 lines 0 comments Download
A tools/tests/skdiff/identical-bits/output-expected/return_value View 1 chunk +1 line, -0 lines 0 comments Download
A tools/tests/skdiff/identical-bits/output-expected/stdout View 1 chunk +4 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 3
epoger
12 years, 6 months ago (2012-05-30 14:23:28 UTC) #1
TomH
LGTM. Nit: Could you add a comment to run.sh explaining why we have these particular ...
12 years, 6 months ago (2012-05-30 14:29:32 UTC) #2
epoger
12 years, 6 months ago (2012-05-30 14:36:03 UTC) #3
https://codereview.appspot.com/6260055/diff/4001/tools/tests/run.sh
File tools/tests/run.sh (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/6260055/diff/4001/tools/tests/run.sh#newcode43
tools/tests/run.sh:43: # Run skdiff over a variety of file pair types: identical
bits, identical
Is this better?  If there are further adjustments that would help more, please
walk over and we can fix it together.

(My ulterior motive for this CL is to prepare for a change in which skdiff will
return nonzero exit value if there are mismatching images... this will allow me
to run skdiff, instead of gm, in the buildbots.)
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b