Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(280)

Issue 6208063: Make skdiff use enumeration of result types instead of separate booleans for each result type (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
12 years, 6 months ago by epoger
Modified:
12 years, 6 months ago
Reviewers:
reed1, TomH
CC:
skia-review_googlegroups.com
Base URL:
http://skia.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Make skdiff use enumeration of result types instead of separate booleans for each result type. This is one step on the way to a more robust version of skdiff that we can use to address http://code.google.com/p/skia/issues/detail?id=473 ('PDF gradtext gm image results are nondeterministic') I have confirmed that skdiff results will not change, using tools/tests/run.sh. Committed: https://code.google.com/p/skia/source/detail?r=3972

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : #

Patch Set 3 : #

Patch Set 4 : #

Patch Set 5 : #

Total comments: 4
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+68 lines, -34 lines) Patch
M tools/skdiff_main.cpp View 1 2 3 4 15 chunks +68 lines, -34 lines 4 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 5
epoger
first LG "wins"
12 years, 6 months ago (2012-05-16 14:46:30 UTC) #1
TomH
LGTM https://codereview.appspot.com/6208063/diff/8001/tools/skdiff_main.cpp File tools/skdiff_main.cpp (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/6208063/diff/8001/tools/skdiff_main.cpp#newcode828 tools/skdiff_main.cpp:828: case kBaseMissing: // fall through? https://codereview.appspot.com/6208063/diff/8001/tools/skdiff_main.cpp#newcode958 tools/skdiff_main.cpp:958: case ...
12 years, 6 months ago (2012-05-16 14:53:35 UTC) #2
TomH
On 2012/05/16 14:53:35, TomH wrote: > LGTM At last, victory is mine!
12 years, 6 months ago (2012-05-16 14:53:48 UTC) #3
epoger
Hey, when code review is rushed, EVERYBODY wins. Thanks... https://codereview.appspot.com/6208063/diff/8001/tools/skdiff_main.cpp File tools/skdiff_main.cpp (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/6208063/diff/8001/tools/skdiff_main.cpp#newcode828 tools/skdiff_main.cpp:828: ...
12 years, 6 months ago (2012-05-16 14:56:52 UTC) #4
TomH
12 years, 6 months ago (2012-05-16 14:58:22 UTC) #5
On 2012/05/16 14:56:52, epoger wrote:
> Hey, when code review is rushed, EVERYBODY wins.

Rushed? Hey, there were *6 whole seconds* per new line of code between request
for reviews and review submission!
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b