Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(5874)

Issue 5967043: Remove UserKey class, move registry-related functions out of string_util. (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
12 years, 1 month ago by thakis
Modified:
12 years, 1 month ago
CC:
rlz-codereviews_googlegroups.com
Base URL:
https://rlz.googlecode.com/svn/trunk
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Remove UserKey class, move registry-related functions out of string_util. No intended functionality change, just moving code around. BUG=none TEST=none

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 1
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+47 lines, -74 lines) Patch
M lib/string_utils.h View 2 chunks +0 lines, -18 lines 0 comments Download
M lib/string_utils.cc View 3 chunks +1 line, -34 lines 0 comments Download
M win/lib/machine_deal.cc View 2 chunks +0 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download
M win/lib/rlz_value_store_registry.cc View 2 chunks +2 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download
M win/lib/user_key.h View 1 chunk +15 lines, -10 lines 0 comments Download
M win/lib/user_key.cc View 2 chunks +29 lines, -8 lines 1 comment Download

Messages

Total messages: 2
thakis
As discussed. I'll rename user_key to registry_util in an immediate follow-up.
12 years, 1 month ago (2012-03-30 00:27:44 UTC) #1
Roger Tawa (Google)
12 years, 1 month ago (2012-03-30 13:30:52 UTC) #2
lgtm, one comment below

https://codereview.appspot.com/5967043/diff/1/win/lib/user_key.cc
File win/lib/user_key.cc (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/5967043/diff/1/win/lib/user_key.cc#newcode53
win/lib/user_key.cc:53: ASSERT_STRING("Could not open HKEY_CURRENT_USER");
What's the point of this if and the variable key?  I think with all the
refactoring of this code, its no longer needed.
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b