> In the existing src/pkg code, 'FooId' greatly wins out over 'FooID'. It > would ...
14 years, 10 months ago
(2011-12-16 20:45:49 UTC)
#3
> In the existing src/pkg code, 'FooId' greatly wins out over 'FooID'. It
> would seem that swimming against the tide would be wrong.
does it? for some reason i thought acronyms being UPPER was more
prevalent
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org> wrote: >> In the ...
14 years, 10 months ago
(2011-12-16 20:49:28 UTC)
#4
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org> wrote:
>> In the existing src/pkg code, 'FooId' greatly wins out over 'FooID'. It
>> would seem that swimming against the tide would be wrong.
>
> does it? for some reason i thought acronyms being UPPER was more
> prevalent
go/src/pkg$ grep '[a-z]ID[^a-zA-Z]' -r .
vs
go/src/pkg$ grep '[a-z]Id[^a-zA-Z]' -r .
It seems that Id is the way to go. Possibility pertinent is that Id/ID
isn't an acronym, it's just a truncation of 'Identifier'. In the same
fashion, it's PeerCert, not PeerCERT.
Cheers
AGL
Hello dave@cheney.net, agl@chromium.org, agl@golang.org (cc: golang-dev@googlegroups.com), I'd like you to review this change to https://go.googlecode.com/hg/
14 years, 10 months ago
(2011-12-20 02:40:11 UTC)
#5
Looks pretty good too me, thanks for cleaning this up. http://codereview.appspot.com/5494057/diff/1003/src/pkg/exp/ssh/client.go File src/pkg/exp/ssh/client.go (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5494057/diff/1003/src/pkg/exp/ssh/client.go#newcode342 ...
14 years, 10 months ago
(2011-12-20 08:32:01 UTC)
#6
Issue 5494057: code review 5494057: exp/ssh: rename (some) fields
(Closed)
Created 14 years, 10 months ago by cw
Modified 14 years, 9 months ago
Reviewers:
Base URL:
Comments: 2