Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(1650)

Issue 5492054: Fix Android build (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
12 years, 11 months ago by digit
Modified:
12 years, 9 months ago
Reviewers:
DerekS, caryclark1, reed1
CC:
skia-review_googlegroups.com
Base URL:
http://skia.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Fix Android build Committed: https://code.google.com/p/skia/source/detail?r=3113

Patch Set 1 #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+20 lines, -21 lines) Patch
M src/animator/SkDisplayEvent.cpp View 2 chunks +20 lines, -21 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 10
DerekS
The android port doesn't support animator. It seems like somehow gyp was confused when it ...
12 years, 10 months ago (2012-01-09 14:46:37 UTC) #1
digit
On 2012/01/09 14:46:37, djsollen wrote: > The android port doesn't support animator. It seems like ...
12 years, 10 months ago (2012-01-09 14:58:09 UTC) #2
reed1
1. these changes seem correct 2. animator can be removed from any android builds as ...
12 years, 10 months ago (2012-01-09 15:09:06 UTC) #3
DerekS
I'm fine with taking the change as it is an improvement over the current state, ...
12 years, 10 months ago (2012-01-09 15:18:37 UTC) #4
digit
On 2012/01/09 15:18:37, djsollen wrote: > I'm fine with taking the change as it is ...
12 years, 10 months ago (2012-01-09 17:51:17 UTC) #5
DerekS
lgtm. It's fine to submit. Do you know which make file is referencing that class? ...
12 years, 10 months ago (2012-01-09 18:09:01 UTC) #6
digit
On 2012/01/09 18:09:01, djsollen wrote: > lgtm. > > It's fine to submit. Do you ...
12 years, 10 months ago (2012-01-09 18:19:39 UTC) #7
digit
12 years, 10 months ago (2012-01-09 18:25:15 UTC) #8
DerekS
On 2012/01/09 18:25:15, digit wrote: The line 154 is correct, but it should be overridden ...
12 years, 10 months ago (2012-01-09 18:29:42 UTC) #9
digit
12 years, 9 months ago (2012-01-31 14:12:09 UTC) #10
I'm going to submit it. I don't know what's happening, really, but having to
cherry-pick this change on top of my other changes each time I want to check
that they build everything properly, then revert them before uploading is time
consuming and error-prone.

Thanks.
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b