Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(3086)

Issue 54560044: Add a very useful hint about relation ordering.

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
10 years, 3 months ago by benji
Modified:
10 years, 3 months ago
Reviewers:
mp+202373, rick.harding, benji-york
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Add a very useful hint about relation ordering. https://code.launchpad.net/~benji/charmworld/1263120-allow-self-referential-relations-in-bundles/+merge/202373 (do not edit description out of merge proposal)

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 2

Patch Set 2 : Add a very useful hint about relation ordering. #

Patch Set 3 : Add a very useful hint about relation ordering. #

Patch Set 4 : Add a very useful hint about relation ordering. #

Patch Set 5 : Add a very useful hint about relation ordering. #

Patch Set 6 : Add a very useful hint about relation ordering. #

Patch Set 7 : Add a very useful hint about relation ordering. #

Patch Set 8 : Add a very useful hint about relation ordering. #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+72 lines, -6 lines) Patch
A [revision details] View 1 1 chunk +2 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M charmworld/lib/proof.py View 1 1 chunk +3 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M charmworld/lib/tests/test_proof.py View 1 2 chunks +30 lines, -4 lines 0 comments Download
M charmworld/views/tests/test_proof.py View 2 chunks +37 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 4
benji
Please take a look.
10 years, 3 months ago (2014-01-20 20:49:56 UTC) #1
rick.harding
LGTM with the one question on the assumption in the hint. https://codereview.appspot.com/54560044/diff/1/charmworld/lib/proof.py File charmworld/lib/proof.py (right): ...
10 years, 3 months ago (2014-01-20 20:53:31 UTC) #2
benji
Please take a look.
10 years, 3 months ago (2014-01-21 13:47:12 UTC) #3
benji-york
10 years, 3 months ago (2014-01-21 13:47:49 UTC) #4
Fixed bug found in review.

https://codereview.appspot.com/54560044/diff/1/charmworld/lib/proof.py
File charmworld/lib/proof.py (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/54560044/diff/1/charmworld/lib/proof.py#newcode96
charmworld/lib/proof.py:96: raise ProofError(
On 2014/01/20 20:53:31, rick.harding wrote:
> Doesn't this hint need to account for the case of non matching types? 

Indeed!  I've fixed this and added a test.
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b