Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(135)

Issue 5089045: Bug fixes to SES test, repair, and initialization (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
14 years, 6 months ago by MarkM
Modified:
14 years, 6 months ago
Reviewers:
ihab.awad
CC:
google-caja-discuss_googlegroups.com
Base URL:
http://google-caja.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/
Visibility:
Public.

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : Bug fixes to SES test, repair, and initialization #

Patch Set 3 : Bug fixes to SES test, repair, and initialization #

Patch Set 4 : Bug fixes to SES test, repair, and initialization #

Patch Set 5 : Bug fixes to SES test, repair, and initialization #

Total comments: 4

Patch Set 6 : Bug fixes to SES test, repair, and initialization #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+104 lines, -46 lines) Patch
M src/com/google/caja/ses/repairES5.js View 1 2 3 4 5 35 chunks +97 lines, -44 lines 0 comments Download
M src/com/google/caja/ses/startSES.js View 1 2 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 0 comments Download
M src/com/google/caja/ses/useHTMLLogger.js View 1 2 1 chunk +6 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 3
MarkM
14 years, 6 months ago (2011-09-28 02:56:31 UTC) #1
ihab.awad
lgtm++ http://codereview.appspot.com/5089045/diff/9002/src/com/google/caja/ses/repairES5.js File src/com/google/caja/ses/repairES5.js (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5089045/diff/9002/src/com/google/caja/ses/repairES5.js#newcode398 src/com/google/caja/ses/repairES5.js:398: that = ___global_valueOf_function___(); Why capture the retval? It's ...
14 years, 6 months ago (2011-09-28 04:45:07 UTC) #2
MarkM
14 years, 6 months ago (2011-09-28 11:08:02 UTC) #3
http://codereview.appspot.com/5089045/diff/9002/src/com/google/caja/ses/repai...
File src/com/google/caja/ses/repairES5.js (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/5089045/diff/9002/src/com/google/caja/ses/repai...
src/com/google/caja/ses/repairES5.js:398: that =
___global_valueOf_function___();
On 2011/09/28 04:45:07, ihab.awad wrote:
> Why capture the retval? It's not used....

Thanks for catching this. I'm now testing it in two places I should have -- to
see if the thing that leaked is indeed the global, or if instead we're observing
a new symptom.

While I was looking at this, I also noticed two other such tests below that I
flipped to be more consistent with these.
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b