It could be more general. Instead of "package builtin", we could use "package documentation" and ...
13 years, 7 months ago
(2011-08-16 01:59:32 UTC)
#3
It could be more general.
Instead of "package builtin", we could use "package documentation" and
make that the special case. Then it could be used by authors of other
libraries.
Andrew
Perhaps a more general mechanism is warranted in another CL. I'll think a bit about ...
13 years, 7 months ago
(2011-08-16 02:07:03 UTC)
#5
Perhaps a more general mechanism is warranted in another CL. I'll
think a bit about it.
- Robert
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org> wrote:
> It could be more general.
>
> Instead of "package builtin", we could use "package documentation" and
> make that the special case. Then it could be used by authors of other
> libraries.
>
> Andrew
>
Issue 4904045: code review 4904045: godoc: show all top-level decls for (fake) package builtin
(Closed)
Created 13 years, 7 months ago by gri
Modified 13 years, 7 months ago
Reviewers:
Base URL:
Comments: 0