http://codereview.appspot.com/4581041/diff/1/src/ibusconfig.c File src/ibusconfig.c (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/4581041/diff/1/src/ibusconfig.c#newcode214 src/ibusconfig.c:214: return IBUS_CONFIG (object); Don't we have to call g_dbus_proxy_get_name_owner here? The synchronous version does it: https://github.com/ibus/ibus/commit/61f0894c3555478117e9d5f286d0085bd5afdad3
http://codereview.appspot.com/4581041/diff/1/src/ibusconfig.c File src/ibusconfig.c (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/4581041/diff/1/src/ibusconfig.c#newcode214 src/ibusconfig.c:214: return IBUS_CONFIG (object); On 2011/06/07 05:05:52, Yusuke Sato wrote: > Don't we have to call g_dbus_proxy_get_name_owner here? > > The synchronous version does it: > https://github.com/ibus/ibus/commit/61f0894c3555478117e9d5f286d0085bd5afdad3 Done.
On 2011/06/08 19:56:40, Peng wrote: > http://codereview.appspot.com/4581041/diff/1/src/ibusconfig.c > File src/ibusconfig.c (right): > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4581041/diff/1/src/ibusconfig.c#newcode214 > src/ibusconfig.c:214: return IBUS_CONFIG (object); > On 2011/06/07 05:05:52, Yusuke Sato wrote: > > Don't we have to call g_dbus_proxy_get_name_owner here? > > > > The synchronous version does it: > > https://github.com/ibus/ibus/commit/61f0894c3555478117e9d5f286d0085bd5afdad3 > > Done. lgtm