Update patch
http://codereview.appspot.com/4449043/diff/2001/java/gadgets/src/test/java/or... File java/gadgets/src/test/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/js/CompilationProcessorTest.java (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/4449043/diff/2001/java/gadgets/src/test/java/or... java/gadgets/src/test/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/js/CompilationProcessorTest.java:71: isA(String.class))).andReturn(outputResponse); why not test w/ actual values eg "var extern3;" et al?
LGTM ..beyond that. On 2011/04/21 23:18:12, johnfargo wrote: > http://codereview.appspot.com/4449043/diff/2001/java/gadgets/src/test/java/or... > File > java/gadgets/src/test/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/js/CompilationProcessorTest.java > (right): > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4449043/diff/2001/java/gadgets/src/test/java/or... > java/gadgets/src/test/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/js/CompilationProcessorTest.java:71: > isA(String.class))).andReturn(outputResponse); > why not test w/ actual values eg "var extern3;" et al?
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:18 PM, <johnfargo@gmail.com> wrote: > LGTM > > ..beyond that. > > > On 2011/04/21 23:18:12, johnfargo wrote: > > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4449043/diff/2001/java/gadgets/src/test/java/or... > >> File >> > > > java/gadgets/src/test/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/js/CompilationProcessorTest.java > >> (right): >> > > > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4449043/diff/2001/java/gadgets/src/test/java/or... > > > java/gadgets/src/test/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/js/CompilationProcessorTest.java:71: > >> isA(String.class))).andReturn(outputResponse); >> why not test w/ actual values eg "var extern3;" et al? >> > Didn't want to couple logic of builder with this unit test. I've created a new JsResponseBuilderTest that test just externs. > > > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4449043/ >
LGTM++ On 2011/04/21 23:25:33, mhermanto wrote: > Update patch