Issue 3573043: code review 3573043: runtime: only write to standard error

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
m :	publish + mail comments
M :	edit review message
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line
<Enter> :	respond to / edit current comment
d :	mark current comment as done

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
m :	publish + mail comments
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue
# :	close issue

	Comment/message editing
<Ctrl> + s or <Ctrl> + Enter :	save comment
<Esc> :	cancel edit

Issue 3573043: code review 3573043: runtime: only write to standard error (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review

Created:
15 years, 10 months ago by rsc

Modified:
15 years, 10 months ago

Reviewers:
niemeyer

CC:
r, golang-dev

Visibility:
Public.

runtime: write only to standard error Will mail a warning to golang-nuts once this is submitted.

Created: 15 years, 10 months ago

Download [raw] [tar.bz2]

	Unified diffs	Side-by-side diffs	Stats (+18 lines, -23 lines)			Patch
M	src/pkg/runtime/print.c	View	9 chunks	+18 lines, -18 lines	0 comments	Download
M	src/pkg/runtime/proc.c	View	1 chunk	+0 lines, -1 line	0 comments	Download
M	src/pkg/runtime/runtime.h	View	1 chunk	+0 lines, -1 line	0 comments	Download
M	src/pkg/runtime/runtime.c	View	3 chunks	+0 lines, -3 lines	0 comments	Download

Total messages: 7

rsc

Hello r (cc: golang-dev@googlegroups.com), I'd like you to review this change.

15 years, 10 months ago (2010-12-13 22:04:37 UTC) #1

niemeyer

Would it be worth adding a minor note in the spec about the fact it ...

15 years, 10 months ago (2010-12-13 22:20:28 UTC) #3

rsc

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 17:20, <n13m3y3r@gmail.com> wrote: > Would it be worth adding ...

15 years, 10 months ago (2010-12-14 16:52:34 UTC) #4

rsc

*** Submitted as a65963429cbe *** runtime: write only to standard error Will mail a warning ...

15 years, 10 months ago (2010-12-14 16:52:48 UTC) #5

niemeyer

> that would require defining standard error. "println() will send its output to the standard ...

15 years, 10 months ago (2010-12-14 17:12:13 UTC) #6

rsc

15 years, 10 months ago (2010-12-14 17:19:03 UTC) #7

I'm happy to leave the exact semantics of "print"
up to the implementation.  It doesn't need to be
specified.

Russ