Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(100)

Issue 3437043: Expose RequestItem parameters

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
15 years, 2 months ago by zhoresh
Modified:
15 years, 2 months ago
Reviewers:
johnfargo, dev-remailer
Base URL:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk
Visibility:
Public.

Description

I need to be able to iterate over the request parameters, so adding a get of parameters map.

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 1

Patch Set 2 : Updated to use unmodifiable map #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+5 lines, -1 line) Patch
java/common/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/protocol/BaseRequestItem.java View 1 2 chunks +5 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 5
zhoresh
15 years, 2 months ago (2010-12-08 02:21:27 UTC) #1
johnfargo
http://codereview.appspot.com/3437043/diff/1/java/common/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/protocol/BaseRequestItem.java File java/common/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/protocol/BaseRequestItem.java (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/3437043/diff/1/java/common/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/protocol/BaseRequestItem.java#newcode243 java/common/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/protocol/BaseRequestItem.java:243: return this.parameters; return Collections.unmodifiableMap(...)
15 years, 2 months ago (2010-12-08 19:27:28 UTC) #2
zhoresh
Updated to use unmodifiable map
15 years, 2 months ago (2010-12-08 19:40:24 UTC) #3
johnfargo
LGTM A test to ensure unmodifiability would be nice but not strictly necessary.
15 years, 2 months ago (2010-12-08 22:17:22 UTC) #4
zhoresh
15 years, 2 months ago (2010-12-09 00:19:23 UTC) #5
On 2010/12/08 22:17:22, johnfargo wrote:
> LGTM
> 
> A test to ensure unmodifiability would be nice but not strictly necessary.

Thanks, test was added and code submitted at r1043770
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b