bus: ibus-daemon activates ibus-portal

bus: ibus-daemon activates ibus-portal

When ibus-daemon restarts, ibus-portal exits with on_name_lost() and
the clients wait for portal_name_appeared() until ibus-poral restarts.
Now the clients can connect to ibus-daemon with this way and also
they don't have to activate ibus-portal.

BUG=https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/675
R=Shawn.P.Huang@gmail.com

Committed: 9937a0e4501ccf0cfd238ce7c97733c3099db3f7

[Peng, 2017-08-31 11:03:09]

https://codereview.appspot.com/321530043/diff/1/portal/portal.c
File portal/portal.c (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/321530043/diff/1/portal/portal.c#newcode104
portal/portal.c:104: #if 0
what is it?

[fujiwara, 2017-08-31 11:10:09]

https://codereview.appspot.com/321530043/diff/1/portal/portal.c
File portal/portal.c (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/321530043/diff/1/portal/portal.c#newcode104
portal/portal.c:104: #if 0
On 2017/08/31 11:03:09, Peng wrote:
> what is it?

I thought it's a useful pointer how to get IBusPortalContext and leave it as a
comment.

[Peng, 2017-09-01 10:51:42]

https://codereview.appspot.com/321530043/diff/1/portal/portal.c
File portal/portal.c (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/321530043/diff/1/portal/portal.c#newcode104
portal/portal.c:104: #if 0
On 2017/08/31 11:10:09, fujiwara wrote:
> On 2017/08/31 11:03:09, Peng wrote:
> > what is it?
> 
> I thought it's a useful pointer how to get IBusPortalContext and leave it as a
> comment.

I suggest removing unused code. And it is not difficult to add it back by
checking git log.

[Peng, 2017-09-01 10:52:06]

On 2017/09/01 10:51:42, Peng wrote:
> https://codereview.appspot.com/321530043/diff/1/portal/portal.c
> File portal/portal.c (right):
> 
> https://codereview.appspot.com/321530043/diff/1/portal/portal.c#newcode104
> portal/portal.c:104: #if 0
> On 2017/08/31 11:10:09, fujiwara wrote:
> > On 2017/08/31 11:03:09, Peng wrote:
> > > what is it?
> > 
> > I thought it's a useful pointer how to get IBusPortalContext and leave it as
a
> > comment.
> 
> I suggest removing unused code. And it is not difficult to add it back by
> checking git log.

lgtm with a nit.

[fujiwara, 2017-09-04 03:19:18]

Committed patchset #2 (id:20001) manually as
9937a0e4501ccf0cfd238ce7c97733c3099db3f7 (presubmit successful).