Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(126)

Issue 3003: [issue3560] redundant "base" field in memoryview objects (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
14 years, 3 months ago by GvR
Modified:
13 years, 4 months ago
Reviewers:
CC:
Antoine Pitrou, report_bugs.python.org
Base URL:
http://svn.python.org/view/*checkout*/python/branches/py3k/
Visibility:
Public.

Description

http://bugs.python.org/issue3560

Patch Set 1 #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+24 lines, -18 lines) Patch
Include/memoryobject.h View 3 chunks +19 lines, -13 lines 0 comments Download
Modules/_json.c View 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 0 comments Download
Objects/memoryobject.c View 3 chunks +3 lines, -3 lines 0 comments Download
Objects/unicodeobject.c View 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 3
GvR
Looks good. Go ahead and submit, assuming you've run full tests.
14 years, 3 months ago (2008-08-19 17:18:29 UTC) #1
GvR
PS. The PEP probably needs an update. And the docs.
14 years, 3 months ago (2008-08-19 17:18:45 UTC) #2
GvR
14 years, 3 months ago (2008-08-19 17:20:58 UTC) #3
On 2008/08/19 17:18:45, GvR wrote:
> PS. The PEP probably needs an update. And the docs.

And Misc/NEWS
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b