Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(101)

Issue 2355042: Improve speed for ir.property and reference fields for issue1623 and issue1631 (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
15 years, 4 months ago by ced
Modified:
15 years, 4 months ago
Reviewers:
bch, yangoon1
Visibility:
Public.

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : Fix when res_ids is None #

Total comments: 2
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+82 lines, -77 lines) Patch
M trytond/ir/model.py View 1 chunk +21 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M trytond/ir/property.py View 1 8 chunks +38 lines, -63 lines 2 comments Download
M trytond/model/fields/reference.py View 4 chunks +23 lines, -14 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 5
ced
15 years, 4 months ago (2010-10-03 09:15:39 UTC) #1
ced
15 years, 4 months ago (2010-10-03 09:25:02 UTC) #2
yangoon1
15 years, 4 months ago (2010-10-03 10:57:56 UTC) #3
bch
http://codereview.appspot.com/2355042/diff/3001/trytond/ir/property.py File trytond/ir/property.py (left): http://codereview.appspot.com/2355042/diff/3001/trytond/ir/property.py#oldcode133 trytond/ir/property.py:133: res[field.name][res_id] = False Why this part is removed? (or ...
15 years, 4 months ago (2010-10-03 19:57:43 UTC) #4
ced
15 years, 4 months ago (2010-10-03 20:40:27 UTC) #5
http://codereview.appspot.com/2355042/diff/3001/trytond/ir/property.py
File trytond/ir/property.py (left):

http://codereview.appspot.com/2355042/diff/3001/trytond/ir/property.py#oldcod...
trytond/ir/property.py:133: res[field.name][res_id] = False
On 2010/10/03 19:57:43, bch wrote:
> Why this part is removed? (or why was it needed in the first place ?).
Because it is already managed by the Reference field.
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b