Looks ok so far for me. It would be easier to review two different changesets ...
15 years, 5 months ago
(2010-08-25 10:47:27 UTC)
#2
Looks ok so far for me. It would be easier to review two different changesets
and finally it should be committed in two changesets anyway.
http://codereview.appspot.com/1980049/diff/1/3
File proteus/config.py (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1980049/diff/1/3#newcode53
proteus/config.py:53: with Transaction().start(self._config.database_name,
Originally it was self._config.database.database_name and I couldn't detect the
change to require instead self._config.database_name. Probably I am mislead,
could you give a hint?
http://codereview.appspot.com/1980049/diff/1/3 File proteus/config.py (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/1980049/diff/1/3#newcode53 proteus/config.py:53: with Transaction().start(self._config.database_name, On 2010/08/25 10:47:28, yangoon wrote: > Originally ...
15 years, 5 months ago
(2010-08-25 11:25:52 UTC)
#3
http://codereview.appspot.com/1980049/diff/1/3
File proteus/config.py (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1980049/diff/1/3#newcode53
proteus/config.py:53: with Transaction().start(self._config.database_name,
On 2010/08/25 10:47:28, yangoon wrote:
> Originally it was self._config.database.database_name and I couldn't detect
the
> change to require instead self._config.database_name. Probably I am mislead,
> could you give a hint?
There is no more database on config
Issue 1980049: Update for new Transaction and Cache
(Closed)
Created 15 years, 5 months ago by ced
Modified 15 years, 5 months ago
Reviewers: bch, yangoon1
Base URL:
Comments: 2