Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(441)

Issue 196060: Use model singleton to define party sequence (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
16 years ago by bch
Modified:
16 years ago
Reviewers:
ced, yangoon1
Visibility:
Public.

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 1
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+68 lines, -3 lines) Patch
M __init__.py View 1 chunk +1 line, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M __tryton__.py View 1 chunk +1 line, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M category.xml View 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 0 comments Download
A configuration.py View 1 chunk +17 lines, -0 lines 1 comment Download
A configuration.xml View 1 chunk +41 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M party.py View 1 chunk +7 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 5
bch
16 years ago (2010-01-29 11:06:32 UTC) #1
ced
http://codereview.appspot.com/196060/diff/1/5 File configuration.py (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/196060/diff/1/5#newcode13 configuration.py:13: ('company', 'in', [Eval('company'), False]), Sequence on Party doesn't depend ...
16 years ago (2010-01-29 15:51:04 UTC) #2
bch
On 2010/01/29 15:51:04, ced wrote: > http://codereview.appspot.com/196060/diff/1/5 > File configuration.py (right): > > http://codereview.appspot.com/196060/diff/1/5#newcode13 > ...
16 years ago (2010-01-29 16:26:49 UTC) #3
ced
On 2010/01/29 16:26:49, bch wrote: > On 2010/01/29 15:51:04, ced wrote: > > http://codereview.appspot.com/196060/diff/1/5 > ...
16 years ago (2010-01-29 16:31:23 UTC) #4
yangoon1
16 years ago (2010-01-31 22:16:04 UTC) #5

          
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b