Add rules on sequences

Sequences can now only be accessed by groups added on the corresponding sequence type (like for editing padding or the current number).

Root user is used to increment them.

[ced, 2010-01-15 23:35:10]

http://codereview.appspot.com/189094/diff/1/2
File trytond/ir/sequence.py (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/189094/diff/1/2#newcode136
trytond/ir/sequence.py:136: # bypass rules on sequences
I will let the bypass on get_id function because get_id could be called
directly.

http://codereview.appspot.com/189094/diff/1/3
File trytond/res/ir.py (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/189094/diff/1/3#newcode134
trytond/res/ir.py:134: res = super(SequenceTypeGroup, self).delete(cursor, user,
ids, context=context)
80 cols

http://codereview.appspot.com/189094/diff/1/3#newcode158
trytond/res/ir.py:158: groups = fields.Function('get_groups', type='many2many',
Where is get_groups?

http://codereview.appspot.com/189094/diff/1/3#newcode162
trytond/res/ir.py:162: def groups_search(self, cursor, user, name, args,
context=None):
Should be named search_groups

[ced, 2010-01-18 08:37:36]

http://codereview.appspot.com/189094/diff/1/3
File trytond/res/ir.py (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/189094/diff/1/3#newcode157
trytond/res/ir.py:157: _name = 'ir.sequence'
Need also for ir.sequence.strict

http://codereview.appspot.com/189094/diff/1/4
File trytond/res/ir.xml (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/189094/diff/1/4#newcode469
trytond/res/ir.xml:469: <record model="ir.rule.group" id="rule_group_sequence">
Is it working with the one define in company?

http://codereview.appspot.com/189094/diff/1/4#newcode470
trytond/res/ir.xml:470: <field name="model" search="[('model', '=',
'ir.sequence')]"/>
Need also one for ir.sequence.strict

[ced, 2010-01-18 15:19:22]

http://codereview.appspot.com/189094/diff/1006/12
File trytond/res/ir.py (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/189094/diff/1006/12#newcode5
trytond/res/ir.py:5: from collections import defaultdict
Only available since 2.5

[ced, 2010-01-18 15:37:23]

http://codereview.appspot.com/189094/diff/16/18
File trytond/res/ir.py (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/189094/diff/16/18#newcode168
trytond/res/ir.py:168: code2seq = dict((s.code, s.id) for s in sequences)
Only works if code is unique.

[ced, 2010-01-18 16:23:08]

http://codereview.appspot.com/189094/diff/16/18
File trytond/res/ir.py (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/189094/diff/16/18#newcode168
trytond/res/ir.py:168: code2seq = dict((s.code, s.id) for s in sequences)
On 2010/01/18 15:37:23, ced wrote:
> Only works if code is unique.

I would prefer to make a uniq constraint on code

[bch, 2010-01-18 16:25:09]

> On 2010/01/18 15:37:23, ced wrote:
> > Only works if code is unique.
> 
> I would prefer to make a uniq constraint on code

What about accounting sequences that share the same code across periods ?

[ced, 2010-01-18 16:41:54]

On 2010/01/18 16:25:09, bch wrote:
> > On 2010/01/18 15:37:23, ced wrote:
> > > Only works if code is unique.
> > 
> > I would prefer to make a uniq constraint on code
> 
> What about accounting sequences that share the same code across periods ?

Yes that is true. I was thinking about ir.sequence.type