Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(40)

Issue 186239: Better test for json as there is a different json module for python < 2.6 (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
16 years, 1 month ago by ced
Modified:
16 years, 1 month ago
Reviewers:
bch, yangoon1
Visibility:
Public.

Patch Set 1 #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+14 lines, -9 lines) Patch
M setup.py View 2 chunks +6 lines, -2 lines 0 comments Download
M trytond/protocols/jsonrpc.py View 2 chunks +4 lines, -4 lines 0 comments Download
M trytond/pyson.py View 1 chunk +4 lines, -3 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 4
ced
16 years, 1 month ago (2010-01-20 11:42:01 UTC) #1
bch
On 2010/01/20 11:42:01, ced wrote: > OK
16 years, 1 month ago (2010-01-20 11:46:24 UTC) #2
yangoon1
Looks ok. Do you know http://deron.meranda.us/python/comparing_json_modules/ ? It is not very recent, but demjson there ...
16 years, 1 month ago (2010-01-20 12:58:17 UTC) #3
ced
16 years, 1 month ago (2010-01-20 13:13:38 UTC) #4
On 2010/01/20 12:58:17, yangoon wrote:
> Looks ok.
> 
> Do you know http://deron.meranda.us/python/comparing_json_modules/ ?
> 
> It is not very recent, but demjson there seems to be a good choice (despite
the
> fact, that the author of the test is also the author of demjson).

No but json (simplejson) is a Python base module in 2.6 and have some part in C
for speed.
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b