LGTM http://codereview.appspot.com/166045/diff/1/2 File tests/com/google/caja/plugin/domita_test_untrusted.html (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/166045/diff/1/2#newcode464 tests/com/google/caja/plugin/domita_test_untrusted.html:464: <option value="0">0</option> Avoid testcase where value == selectedIndex to be sure you're not getting a spurious passing test.
On 2009/12/04 00:41:56, jasvir wrote: > LGTM > > http://codereview.appspot.com/166045/diff/1/2 > File tests/com/google/caja/plugin/domita_test_untrusted.html (right): > > http://codereview.appspot.com/166045/diff/1/2#newcode464 > tests/com/google/caja/plugin/domita_test_untrusted.html:464: <option > value="0">0</option> > Avoid testcase where value == selectedIndex to be sure you're not getting a > spurious passing test. Done.
On 2009/12/09 00:40:12, metaweta wrote: > On 2009/12/04 00:41:56, jasvir wrote: > > LGTM > > > > http://codereview.appspot.com/166045/diff/1/2 > > File tests/com/google/caja/plugin/domita_test_untrusted.html (right): > > > > http://codereview.appspot.com/166045/diff/1/2#newcode464 > > tests/com/google/caja/plugin/domita_test_untrusted.html:464: <option > > value="0">0</option> > > Avoid testcase where value == selectedIndex to be sure you're not getting a > > spurious passing test. > > Done. @3896