Issue 14537043: jujuc: restore relation-get output for missing

Keyboard Shortcuts

	File
u :	up to issue
m :	publish + mail comments
M :	edit review message
j / k :	jump to file after / before current file
J / K :	jump to next file with a comment after / before current file
	Side-by-side diff
i :	toggle intra-line diffs
e :	expand all comments
c :	collapse all comments
s :	toggle showing all comments
n / p :	next / previous diff chunk or comment
N / P :	next / previous comment
<Up> / <Down> :	next / previous line
<Enter> :	respond to / edit current comment
d :	mark current comment as done

	Issue
u :	up to list of issues
m :	publish + mail comments
j / k :	jump to patch after / before current patch
o / <Enter> :	open current patch in side-by-side view
i :	open current patch in unified diff view

	Issue List
j / k :	jump to issue after / before current issue
o / <Enter> :	open current issue
# :	close issue

	Comment/message editing
<Ctrl> + s or <Ctrl> + Enter :	save comment
<Esc> :	cancel edit

Issue 14537043: jujuc: restore relation-get output for missing

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review

Created:
10 years, 7 months ago by fwereade

Modified:
10 years, 7 months ago

Reviewers:
mp+189814, jameinel

Visibility:
Public.

Description

jujuc: restore relation-get output for missing ...values. Fixes lp:1236754. Also added explict tests for output formatters with nil/"". https://code.launchpad.net/~fwereade/juju-core/relation-get-output/+merge/189814 (do not edit description out of merge proposal)

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : jujuc: restore relation-get output for missing #

Created: 10 years, 7 months ago

Download [raw] [tar.bz2]

	Unified diffs	Side-by-side diffs	Stats (+45 lines, -18 lines)			Patch
A	[revision details]	View	1 chunk	+2 lines, -0 lines	0 comments	Download
M	cmd/output_test.go	View	5 chunks	+16 lines, -6 lines	0 comments	Download
M	worker/uniter/jujuc/relation-get.go	View	1 chunk	+6 lines, -6 lines	0 comments	Download
M	worker/uniter/jujuc/relation-get_test.go	View	4 chunks	+21 lines, -6 lines	0 comments	Download

Messages

Total messages: 3

Expand All Messages | Collapse All Messages

jameinel

10 years, 7 months ago (2013-10-08 12:02:04 UTC) #3

LGTM, at least it matches what happened on the bug. Did you test it manually?

Expand All Messages | Collapse All Messages