On 2012/10/11 13:23:48, quanstro wrote:
a little longer description. on plan 9 i found that for
an unsigned-preserving compiler with larger pointers than
integers, small negative p.y would result in a bad pointer.
since the u32int would not be signed extended, it could have
a value like 0x00000000fffffff4, which is no longer small or
negative.
