Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(695)

Issue 6306054: [google-4_6] indirect_call promotion for streaming LIPO

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
11 years, 11 months ago by xur
Modified:
11 years, 11 months ago
Reviewers:
davidxl
CC:
gcc-patches_gcc.gnu.org
Base URL:
svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/google/gcc-4_6/gcc/
Visibility:
Public.

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 28

Patch Set 2 : [google-4_6] indirect_call promotion for streaming LIPO (patchset 2) #

Total comments: 2
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+584 lines, -63 lines) Patch
M cgraph.h View 2 chunks +28 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M ipa-split.c View 1 1 chunk +2 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download
M lto-cgraph.c View 5 chunks +61 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M lto-streamer-in.c View 1 4 chunks +63 lines, -3 lines 0 comments Download
M lto-symtab.c View 6 chunks +136 lines, -34 lines 0 comments Download
M lto/lto.c View 1 chunk +3 lines, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M passes.c View 1 chunk +1 line, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M tree-pass.h View 1 chunk +1 line, -0 lines 0 comments Download
M value-prof.c View 1 14 chunks +289 lines, -25 lines 2 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 7
xur
Hi, This patch is for google-4_6 branch only. It implements the multi-target indirect-call promotion as ...
11 years, 11 months ago (2012-06-07 20:29:32 UTC) #1
davidxl
http://codereview.appspot.com/6306054/diff/1/cgraph.h File cgraph.h (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6306054/diff/1/cgraph.h#newcode410 cgraph.h:410: Why not putting this into value-prof.h? http://codereview.appspot.com/6306054/diff/1/ipa-split.c File ipa-split.c ...
11 years, 11 months ago (2012-06-07 21:46:53 UTC) #2
xur
will send the new patch set in a few minutes. http://codereview.appspot.com/6306054/diff/1/cgraph.h File cgraph.h (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6306054/diff/1/cgraph.h#newcode410 ...
11 years, 11 months ago (2012-06-07 22:22:27 UTC) #3
xur
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 3:22 PM, <xur@google.com> wrote: > will send the new ...
11 years, 11 months ago (2012-06-07 23:19:02 UTC) #4
xur
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 3:22 PM, <xur@google.com> wrote: > > will send the ...
11 years, 11 months ago (2012-06-07 23:20:17 UTC) #5
xur
Hi, This patch is for google-4_6 branch only. Patch Set 2. Tested is undergoing. 2012-06-07 ...
11 years, 11 months ago (2012-06-07 23:24:15 UTC) #6
davidxl
11 years, 11 months ago (2012-06-07 23:32:10 UTC) #7
ok for google branches -- LTO specific bugs should be isolated and submitted
upstream.

David

http://codereview.appspot.com/6306054/diff/5001/value-prof.c
File value-prof.c (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/6306054/diff/5001/value-prof.c#newcode1720
value-prof.c:1720: direct_call2 = 0;
Ok for now -- but it may point to missing opportunties.

http://codereview.appspot.com/6306054/diff/5001/value-prof.c#newcode1728
value-prof.c:1728: ret = (icall_promotion_info_t *) XNEW
(icall_promotion_info_t);
XNEWC here
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b